Re: [PATCH] Took care of some grammatical mistakes

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Mon Nov 27 2023 - 14:41:45 EST


Hi,

On 11/27/23 07:57, attreyee-muk wrote:
> Respected Maintainers,
>
> I have made some grammatical changes in the livepatch.rst file where I
> felt that the sentence would have sounded more correct and would have become easy for
> beginners to understand by reading.
> Requesting review of my proposed changes from the mainatiners.
>
> Thank You
> Attreyee Mukherjee
>
> Signed-off-by: attreyee-muk <tintinm2017@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst
> index 68e3651e8af9..a2d2317b7d6b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst
> @@ -35,11 +35,11 @@ and livepatching:
>
> All three approaches need to modify the existing code at runtime. Therefore
> -they need to be aware of each other and not step over each other's toes.
> +they need to be aware of each other and not step over each others' toes.

I've never seen that written like that, so I disagree here. FWIW.

> Most of these problems are solved by using the dynamic ftrace framework as
> a base. A Kprobe is registered as a ftrace handler when the function entry
> is probed, see CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE. Also an alternative function from

thanks.
--
~Randy