Re: [PATCH 5/7] mm/mm_init.c: Extend init unavailable range doc info

From: Mike Rapoport
Date: Thu Nov 23 2023 - 05:19:13 EST


Hi Serge,

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 09:24:03PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Besides of the already described reasons the pages backended memory holes
> might be persistent due to having memory mapped IO spaces behind those
> ranges in the framework of flatmem kernel config. Add such note to the
> init_unavailable_range() method kdoc in order to point out to one more
> reason of having the function executed for such regions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> Please let me know if the IO-space pages must be initialized somehow
> differently rather relying on free_area_init() executing the
> init_unavailable_range() method.

Maybe I'm missing something, but why do you need struct pages in the
IO space?

> ---
> mm/mm_init.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> index 077bfe393b5e..3fa33e2d32ba 100644
> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> @@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ overlap_memmap_init(unsigned long zone, unsigned long *pfn)
> * - physical memory bank size is not necessarily the exact multiple of the
> * arbitrary section size
> * - early reserved memory may not be listed in memblock.memory
> + * - memory mapped IO space
> * - memory layouts defined with memmap= kernel parameter may not align
> * nicely with memmap sections
> *
> --
> 2.42.1
>

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.