Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: memcg: print out cgroup name in the memcg tracepoints

From: Dmitry Rokosov
Date: Thu Nov 23 2023 - 03:45:26 EST


On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 08:15:47AM +0000, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:03:34AM +0300, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> [...]
> > > > + cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup,
> > > > + __entry->name,
> > > > + sizeof(__entry->name));
> > >
> > > Any reason not to use cgroup_ino? cgroup_name may conflict and be
> > > ambiguous.
> >
> > I actually didn't consider it, as the cgroup name serves as a clear tag
> > for filtering the appropriate cgroup in the entire trace file. However,
> > you are correct that there might be conflicts with cgroup names.
> > Therefore, it might be better to display both tags: ino and name. What
> > do you think on this?
> >
>
> I can see putting cgroup name can avoid pre or post processing, so
> putting both are fine. Though keep in mind that cgroup_name acquires a
> lock which may impact the applications running on the system.

Are you talking about kernfs_rename_lock? Yes, it's acquired each
time... Unfortunatelly, I don't know a way to save cgroup_name one time
somehow...

--
Thank you,
Dmitry