Re: Re: EEVDF/vhost regression (bisected to 86bfbb7ce4f6 sched/fair: Add lag based placement)

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 02:17:21PM +0100, Tobias Huschle wrote:

> We applied both suggested patch options and ran the test again, so 
> 
> sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight
> sched/fair: Update min_vruntime for reweight_entity() correctly
> 
> and
> 
> sched/eevdf: Delay dequeue
> 
> Unfortunately, both variants do NOT fix the problem.
> The regression remains unchanged.

Thanks for testing.

> I will continue getting myself familiar with how cgroups are scheduled to dig 
> deeper here. If there are any other ideas, I'd be happy to use them as a 
> starting point for further analysis.
> 
> Would additional traces still be of interest? If so, I would be glad to
> provide them.

So, since it got bisected to the placement logic, but is a cgroup
related issue, I was thinking that 'Delay dequeue' might not cut it,
that only works for tasks, not the internal entities.

The below should also work for internal entities, but last time I poked
around with it I had some regressions elsewhere -- you know, fix one,
wreck another type of situations on hand.

But still, could you please give it a go -- it applies cleanly to linus'
master and -rc2.

---
Subject: sched/eevdf: Revenge of the Sith^WSleepers

For tasks that have received excess service (negative lag) allow them to
gain parity (zero lag) by sleeping.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c     | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/sched/features.h |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d7a3c63a2171..b975e4b07a68 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5110,6 +5110,33 @@ static inline void update_misfit_status(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq) {}
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
+static inline u64
+entity_vlag_sleeper(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
+{
+	u64 now, vdelta;
+	s64 delta;
+
+	if (!(flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP))
+		return se->vlag;
+
+	if (flags & ENQUEUE_MIGRATED)
+		return 0;
+
+	now = rq_clock_task(rq_of(cfs_rq));
+	delta = now - se->exec_start;
+	if (delta < 0)
+		return se->vlag;
+
+	if (sched_feat(GENTLE_SLEEPER))
+		delta /= 2;
+
+	vdelta = __calc_delta(delta, NICE_0_LOAD, &cfs_rq->load);
+	if (vdelta < -se->vlag)
+		return se->vlag + vdelta;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void
 place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 {
@@ -5133,6 +5160,15 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 
 		lag = se->vlag;
 
+		/*
+		 * Allow tasks that have received too much service (negative
+		 * lag) to (re)gain parity (zero lag) by sleeping for the
+		 * equivalent duration. This ensures they will be readily
+		 * eligible.
+		 */
+		if (sched_feat(PLACE_SLEEPER) && lag < 0)
+			lag = entity_vlag_sleeper(cfs_rq, se, flags);
+
 		/*
 		 * If we want to place a task and preserve lag, we have to
 		 * consider the effect of the new entity on the weighted
diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
index a3ddf84de430..722282d3ed07 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -7,6 +7,12 @@
 SCHED_FEAT(PLACE_LAG, true)
 SCHED_FEAT(PLACE_DEADLINE_INITIAL, true)
 SCHED_FEAT(RUN_TO_PARITY, true)
+/*
+ * Let sleepers earn back lag, but not more than 0-lag. GENTLE_SLEEPERS earn at
+ * half the speed.
+ */
+SCHED_FEAT(PLACE_SLEEPER, true)
+SCHED_FEAT(GENTLE_SLEEPER, true)
 
 /*
  * Prefer to schedule the task we woke last (assuming it failed