Re: [PATCH 16/24] mm/swap: reduce scope of get_swap_device in swapin path

From: Huang, Ying
Date: Tue Nov 21 2023 - 19:48:42 EST


Kairui Song <ryncsn@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Move get_swap_device into swapin_readahead, simplify the code
> and prepare for follow up commits.

No. Please don't do this. Please check the get/put_swap_device() usage
rule in the comments of get_swap_device().

"
* When we get a swap entry, if there aren't some other ways to
* prevent swapoff, such as the folio in swap cache is locked, page
* table lock is held, etc., the swap entry may become invalid because
* of swapoff. Then, we need to enclose all swap related functions
* with get_swap_device() and put_swap_device(), unless the swap
* functions call get/put_swap_device() by themselves.
"

This is to simplify the reasoning about swapoff and swap entry.

Why does it bother you?

> For the later part in do_swap_page, using swp_swap_info directly is fine
> since in that context, the swap device is pinned by swapcache reference.

[snip]

--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying