RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: realtek: Add realtek,rtd-gpio

From: TY_Chang[張子逸]
Date: Tue Nov 21 2023 - 02:07:49 EST


Hi, Krzysztof

>On 16/11/2023 12:14, Tzuyi Chang wrote:
>> Add the device tree bindings for the Realtek DHC(Digital Home Center)
>> RTD SoCs GPIO controllers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tzuyi Chang <tychang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v1 to v2 change:
>> 1. Add description for DHC RTD SoCs.
>> 2. Revise the compatible names.
>> 3. Add descriptions for reg and interrupts properties.
>> ---
>> .../bindings/gpio/realtek,rtd-gpio.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/realtek,rtd-gpio.yaml
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/realtek,rtd-gpio.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/realtek,rtd-gpio.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..11c8278801c3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/realtek,rtd-gpio.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) # Copyright 2023
>> +Realtek Semiconductor Corporation %YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/realtek,rtd-gpio.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Realtek DHC GPIO controller
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Tzuyi Chang <tychang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> +
>> +description:
>> + The GPIO controller is designed for the Realtek DHC (Digital Home
>> +Center)
>> + RTD SoC family, which are high-definition media processor SoCs.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + oneOf:
>> + - items:
>
>Drop items.
>
>> + - enum:
>> + - realtek,rtd1295-misc-gpio
>> + - realtek,rtd1295-iso-gpio
>> + - realtek,rtd1395-iso-gpio
>> + - realtek,rtd1619-iso-gpio
>> + - items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - realtek,rtd1319-iso-gpio
>> + - realtek,rtd1619b-iso-gpio
>> + - realtek,rtd1319d-iso-gpio
>> + - realtek,rtd1315e-iso-gpio
>> + - const: realtek,rtd-gpio
>
>Either you use generic compatible for everything or not. Other variants do not
>use generic compatible, so neither should these. Use SoC-specific compatible as
>fallback.
>
>I asked you to to drop this compatible. I could not be more specific, so you just
>ignored this remark.
>
>So again: what is "rtd"? Why it does not appear anywhere in description or title?
>No, drop it.
>

"rtd" is the product series identifier. I will drop this generic compatible and use SoC-specific compatible instead.

Thanks,
Tzuyi Chang