Re: [PATCH] scsi: zfcp: Replace strlcpy() with strscpy()

From: Benjamin Block
Date: Mon Nov 20 2023 - 07:41:01 EST


Hey Kees,

thanks for the patch.

can you please send this patch to linux-scsi and CC the SCSI Maintainers
(Martin and James) instead (having linux-s390 on CC is fine)? zFCP doesn't go
via s390, being a SCSI driver.

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:14:35AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first. This read may exceed
> the destination size limit. This is both inefficient and can lead
> to linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated[1].
> Additionally, it returns the size of the source string, not the
> resulting size of the destination string. In an effort to remove strlcpy()
> completely[2], replace strlcpy() here with strscpy().
>
> Be explicitly robust in the face of truncation, which should be an
> impossible state.
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89 [2]
> Cc: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Benjamin Block <bblock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c
> index 4f0d0e55f0d4..1a29f10767fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fc.c
> @@ -900,8 +900,15 @@ static void zfcp_fc_rspn(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter,
> zfcp_fc_ct_ns_init(&rspn_req->ct_hdr, FC_NS_RSPN_ID,
> FC_SYMBOLIC_NAME_SIZE);
> hton24(rspn_req->rspn.fr_fid.fp_fid, fc_host_port_id(shost));
> - len = strlcpy(rspn_req->rspn.fr_name, fc_host_symbolic_name(shost),
> - FC_SYMBOLIC_NAME_SIZE);
> + len = strscpy(rspn_req->name, fc_host_symbolic_name(shost),
> + sizeof(rspn_req->name));

This is corrct.

> + /*
> + * It should be impossible for this to truncate, as
> + * sizeof(rspn_req->name) is equal to max size of
> + * fc_host_symbolic_name(shost), but check anyway.
> + */
> + if (len < 0)
> + len = sizeof(rspn_req->name) - 1;

I'd rather have a compile-time check, whether the array sizes of
`rspn_req->name` and `fc_host_symbolic_name(shost)` run out of sync, or
against our expectations.

Something like:

len = strscpy(rspn_req->name, fc_host_symbolic_name(shost),
sizeof(rspn_req->name));
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rspn_req->name) !=
sizeof(fc_host_symbolic_name(shost)) ||
sizeof(rspn_req->name) !=
1 << sizeof(rspn_req->rspn.fr_name_len) * 8);
rspn_req->rspn.fr_name_len = len;

Then the last assignment should also be correct; and if something changes -
unexpectedly, because this follows a FC standard - we need to adapt the code
anyway I'd think.

Or am I missing something?

> rspn_req->rspn.fr_name_len = len;
>
> sg_init_one(&fc_req->sg_req, rspn_req, sizeof(*rspn_req));
> --
> 2.34.1
>

--
Best Regards, Benjamin Block / Linux on IBM Z Kernel Development
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH / https://www.ibm.com/privacy
Vors. Aufs.-R.: Gregor Pillen / Geschäftsführung: David Faller
Sitz der Ges.: Böblingen / Registergericht: AmtsG Stuttgart, HRB 243294