Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: trivial: align code

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 17/11/23 17:09, Eugen Hristev ha scritto:
> No functionality change, squash some lines and align parameters for
> function prototypes to 80 chars.

Please use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to get the correct recipients list.

> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c | 13 +++++++------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c
> index 55edf6374578..dda648c1e8f8 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ static unsigned int pcm_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate)
>   	return MTK_AFE_PCM_RATE_48K;
>   }
>   
> -unsigned int mt8186_tdm_relatch_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate)
> +unsigned int mt8186_tdm_relatch_rate_transform(struct device *dev,
> +					       unsigned int rate)

That's not needed, 86 columns is ok.

>   {
>   	switch (rate) {
>   	case 8000:
> @@ -222,7 +223,8 @@ unsigned int mt8186_tdm_relatch_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int
>   	return MTK_AFE_TDM_RELATCH_RATE_48K;
>   }
>   
> -unsigned int mt8186_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate, int aud_blk)
> +unsigned int mt8186_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate,
> +				   int aud_blk)

Same here, not needed.

>   {
>   	switch (aud_blk) {
>   	case MT8186_DAI_PCM:
> @@ -234,14 +236,13 @@ unsigned int mt8186_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate, int au
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -int mt8186_dai_set_priv(struct mtk_base_afe *afe, int id, int priv_size, const void *priv_data)
> +int mt8186_dai_set_priv(struct mtk_base_afe *afe, int id, int priv_size,
> +			const void *priv_data)

ditto.

>   {
>   	struct mt8186_afe_private *afe_priv = afe->platform_priv;
>   	void *temp_data;
>   
> -	temp_data = devm_kzalloc(afe->dev,
> -				 priv_size,
> -				 GFP_KERNEL);
> +	temp_data = devm_kzalloc(afe->dev, priv_size, GFP_KERNEL);

The only change I agree on is this one... but I don't know if it's even worth
making a commit for just this...

Regards,
Angelo