[PATCH] vfio/pci: Separate INTx-enabled vfio_pci_device from unenabled to make the code logic clearer.

From: JianChunfu
Date: Sun Nov 19 2023 - 22:21:18 EST


It seems a little unclear when dealing with vfio_intx_set_signal()
because of vfio_pci_device which is irq_none,
so separate the two situations.

Signed-off-by: JianChunfu <chunfu.jian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
index 6069a11fb51a..b6d126c48393 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
@@ -468,6 +468,8 @@ static int vfio_pci_set_intx_trigger(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
unsigned index, unsigned start,
unsigned count, uint32_t flags, void *data)
{
+ int32_t fd = *(int32_t *)data;
+
if (is_intx(vdev) && !count && (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE)) {
vfio_intx_disable(vdev);
return 0;
@@ -476,28 +478,25 @@ static int vfio_pci_set_intx_trigger(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
if (!(is_intx(vdev) || is_irq_none(vdev)) || start != 0 || count != 1)
return -EINVAL;

- if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD) {
- int32_t fd = *(int32_t *)data;
+ if (!is_intx(vdev)) {
int ret;
+ if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD) {
+ ret = vfio_intx_enable(vdev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;

- if (is_intx(vdev))
- return vfio_intx_set_signal(vdev, fd);
+ ret = vfio_intx_set_signal(vdev, fd);
+ if (ret)
+ vfio_intx_disable(vdev);

- ret = vfio_intx_enable(vdev);
- if (ret)
return ret;
-
- ret = vfio_intx_set_signal(vdev, fd);
- if (ret)
- vfio_intx_disable(vdev);
-
- return ret;
+ } else
+ return -EINVAL;
}

- if (!is_intx(vdev))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE) {
+ if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD) {
+ return vfio_intx_set_signal(vdev, fd);
+ } else if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_NONE) {
vfio_send_intx_eventfd(vdev, NULL);
} else if (flags & VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_BOOL) {
uint8_t trigger = *(uint8_t *)data;
--
2.27.0