Re: [PATCH iwl-next] i40e: Use correct buffer size

From: Kunwu Chan
Date: Sun Nov 19 2023 - 10:12:31 EST


Hi Alexander,
Thank you so much for your reply, I looked at the modification you mentioned, it's really cool. I'll definitely try it next time.

But when using it, will it be easy to forget to free up memory?
Although 'kmalloc_track_caller' is used, according to my understanding, it is also necessary to release the memory at the end of use.

On 2023/11/15 23:39, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
From: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:14:44 +0800

The size of "i40e_dbg_command_buf" is 256, the size of "name"
depends on "IFNAMSIZ", plus a null character and format size,
the total size is more than 256, fix it.

Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c
index 999c9708def5..e3b939c67cfe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static ssize_t i40e_dbg_command_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buffer,
{
struct i40e_pf *pf = filp->private_data;
int bytes_not_copied;
- int buf_size = 256;
+ int buf_size = IFNAMSIZ + sizeof(i40e_dbg_command_buf) + 4;

Reverse Christmas Tree style? Should be the first one in the declaration
list.

char *buf;
int len;

You can fix it in a different way. Given that there's a kzalloc() either
way, why not allocate the precise required amount of bytes by using
kasprintf() instead of kzalloc() + snprintf()? You wouldn't need to
calculate any buffer sizes etc. this way.

Thanks,
Olek