On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 6:07 PM Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
net/ipv4/route.c:783:46: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
net/ipv4/route.c:783:46: expected unsigned int [usertype] key
net/ipv4/route.c:783:46: got restricted __be32 [usertype] new_gw
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx>
We need Fixes: tag for networking patches.
---
net/ipv4/route.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 3290a4442b4a..e8a542c6b031 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ static void __ip_do_redirect(struct rtable *rt, struct sk_buff *skb, struct flow
goto reject_redirect;
}
- n = __ipv4_neigh_lookup(rt->dst.dev, new_gw);
+ n = __ipv4_neigh_lookup(rt->dst.dev, be32_to_cpu(new_gw));
if (!n)
n = neigh_create(&arp_tbl, &new_gw, rt->dst.dev);
if (!IS_ERR(n)) {
--
2.34.1
How was this patch tested ?
You are 'fixing' sparse warnings by replacing them with real bugs.
be32_to_cpu() is going to swap bytes on x86, so the lookup will fail horribly.
Here, if you must silence sparse, you want (__force u32)new_gw
Look at this commit for a template.
commit 3c42b2019863b327caa233072c50739d4144dd16