Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add judgment condition for Kconfig help test

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:39:04PM +0800, Cixi Geng wrote:
> From: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The has_help only counted the  situation which the patch file add
> a help line, when the config was renamed and  modify description,
> the has_help is zero for the "help" line not added.
> 
> here is one case:
>     the modify file: drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig  line(1047)
> 
>     -config SC27XX_ADC
>     +config SPRD_ADC
>      	tristate "Spreadtrum SC27xx series PMICs ADC"
>      	depends on MFD_SC27XX_PMIC || COMPILE_TEST
>     +	depends on ARCH_SPRD
>      	help
>     -	  Say yes here to build support for the integrated ADC inside the
>     -	  Spreadtrum SC27xx series PMICs.
>     +	  Say yes here to build support for the integrated ADC inside of the
>     +	  Spreadtrum SC27xx and UMPxx series PMICs.
> 
>      	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
>      	  will be called sc27xx_adc.
> 
> the checkpatch result:
>     WARNING: please write a help paragraph that fully describes the config symbol
>     #23: FILE: drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig:1050:
>     +config SPRD_ADC
>     +	tristate "Spreadtrum's ADC PMICs driver"
>      	depends on MFD_SC27XX_PMIC || COMPILE_TEST
>     +	depends on ARCH_SPRD
>      	help
>     +	  Say yes here to build support for the integrated ADC inside of the
>     +	  Say yes here to build support for the integrated ADC inside of the
>     +	  Say yes here to build support for the integrated ADC inside of the
>     +	  Spreadtrum SC27xx and UMPxx series PMICs.
> 
>      	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
>      	  will be called sc27xx_adc.
> 
>     total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 17 lines checked

This confuses me. What are you trying to achieve there?

Confused...


-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature