[syzbot] [kernel?] inconsistent lock state in ptrace_attach

From: syzbot
Date: Thu Nov 16 2023 - 06:09:34 EST

Next message: syzbot: "[syzbot] [cgroups?] possible deadlock in ptrace_attach"
Previous message: syzbot: "[syzbot] [kernel?] inconsistent lock state in __lock_task_sighand"
Next in thread: syzbot: "Re: [syzbot] [kernel?] inconsistent lock state in ptrace_attach"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: f31817cbcf48 Add linux-next specific files for 20231116
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=112158fb680000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f59345f1d0a928c
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=cbb25bb9b4d29a773985
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/987488cb251e/disk-f31817cb.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6d4a82d8bd4b/vmlinux-f31817cb.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/fc43dee9cb86/bzImage-f31817cb.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+cbb25bb9b4d29a773985@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
6.7.0-rc1-next-20231116-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
syz-executor.1/5657 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
ffff88807ba4a518 (&sighand->siglock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff88807ba4a518 (&sighand->siglock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: class_spinlock_constructor include/linux/spinlock.h:530 [inline]
ffff88807ba4a518 (&sighand->siglock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: ptrace_set_stopped kernel/ptrace.c:391 [inline]
ffff88807ba4a518 (&sighand->siglock){?.-.}-{2:2}, at: ptrace_attach+0x401/0x650 kernel/ptrace.c:478
{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5718
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
__lock_task_sighand+0xc2/0x340 kernel/signal.c:1422
lock_task_sighand include/linux/sched/signal.h:748 [inline]
send_sigqueue+0x1d4/0x840 kernel/signal.c:1996
posix_timer_event kernel/time/posix-timers.c:298 [inline]
posix_timer_fn+0x181/0x3d0 kernel/time/posix-timers.c:324
__run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1688 [inline]
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x20c/0xc20 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1752
hrtimer_interrupt+0x31b/0x800 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1814
local_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1065 [inline]
__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x10c/0x410 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1082
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x90/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1076
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:645
lock_acquire+0x1f2/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5721
rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:301 [inline]
rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:747 [inline]
batadv_nc_purge_orig_hash net/batman-adv/network-coding.c:408 [inline]
batadv_nc_worker+0x16e/0x10e0 net/batman-adv/network-coding.c:719
process_one_work+0x8a4/0x15f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2636
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2709 [inline]
worker_thread+0x8b6/0x1290 kernel/workqueue.c:2790
kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242
irq event stamp: 1111
hardirqs last enabled at (1111): [<ffffffff8a84a34e>] __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:151 [inline]
hardirqs last enabled at (1111): [<ffffffff8a84a34e>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4e/0x70 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194
hardirqs last disabled at (1110): [<ffffffff8a84a0fe>] __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:108 [inline]
hardirqs last disabled at (1110): [<ffffffff8a84a0fe>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4e/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
softirqs last enabled at (1016): [<ffffffff81310072>] local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
softirqs last enabled at (1016): [<ffffffff81310072>] fpregs_unlock arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h:80 [inline]
softirqs last enabled at (1016): [<ffffffff81310072>] fpu_clone+0x342/0xb60 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:634
softirqs last disabled at (1014): [<ffffffff81310007>] local_bh_disable include/linux/bottom_half.h:20 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (1014): [<ffffffff81310007>] fpregs_lock arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h:72 [inline]
softirqs last disabled at (1014): [<ffffffff81310007>] fpu_clone+0x2d7/0xb60 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:630

other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&sighand->siglock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&sighand->siglock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor.1/5657:
#0: ffff888022a1e3c8 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: class_mutex_intr_constructor include/linux/mutex.h:225 [inline]
#0: ffff888022a1e3c8 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ptrace_attach+0x1eb/0x650 kernel/ptrace.c:455
#1: ffffffff8cc0a098 (tasklist_lock){++++}-{2:2}, at: class_write_lock_constructor include/linux/spinlock.h:564 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8cc0a098 (tasklist_lock){++++}-{2:2}, at: ptrace_attach+0x2c3/0x650 kernel/ptrace.c:464

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5657 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc1-next-20231116-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_usage_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3970 [inline]
valid_state kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4012 [inline]
mark_lock_irq kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4215 [inline]
mark_lock+0x91a/0xc50 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4677
mark_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4586 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x919/0x3b10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5090
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5718
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
class_spinlock_constructor include/linux/spinlock.h:530 [inline]
ptrace_set_stopped kernel/ptrace.c:391 [inline]
ptrace_attach+0x401/0x650 kernel/ptrace.c:478
__do_sys_ptrace+0x204/0x230 kernel/ptrace.c:1290
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x62/0x6a
RIP: 0033:0x7f390ac7cae9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f390ba5a0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000065
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f390ad9c1f0 RCX: 00007f390ac7cae9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000005c RDI: 0000000000000010
RBP: 00007f390acc847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007f390ad9c1f0 R15: 00007ffe8ba90308
</TASK>

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Next message: syzbot: "[syzbot] [cgroups?] possible deadlock in ptrace_attach"
Previous message: syzbot: "[syzbot] [kernel?] inconsistent lock state in __lock_task_sighand"
Next in thread: syzbot: "Re: [syzbot] [kernel?] inconsistent lock state in ptrace_attach"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]