Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] media: videobuf2: Allow exporting of a struct dmabuf

From: Stefan Wahren
Date: Wed Nov 15 2023 - 16:02:15 EST


Am 15.11.23 um 20:31 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:41:11PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Am 09.11.23 um 22:02 schrieb Umang Jain:
From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

videobuf2 only allowed exporting a dmabuf as a file descriptor,
but there are instances where having the struct dma_buf is
useful within the kernel.

Split the current implementation into two, one step which
exports a struct dma_buf, and the second which converts that
into an fd.

Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
...

diff --git a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
index 4b6a9d2ea372..cba4e495f6a2 100644
--- a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
+++ b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
@@ -925,6 +925,21 @@ int vb2_core_streamon(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int type);
*/
int vb2_core_streamoff(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int type);

+/**
+ * vb2_core_expbuf_dmabuf() - Export a buffer as a dma_buf structure
+ * @q: videobuf2 queue
+ * @type: buffer type
+ * @index: id number of the buffer
+ * @plane: index of the plane to be exported, 0 for single plane queues
+ * @flags: flags for newly created file, currently only O_CLOEXEC is
+ * supported, refer to manual of open syscall for more details
i think "newly created file" could be confusing here
Would "newly created dmabuf file handle" be clearer and work for
everybody ?
i'm fine with it

+ *
+ * Return: Returns the dmabuf pointer
+ */
+struct dma_buf *vb2_core_expbuf_dmabuf(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int type,
+ unsigned int index, unsigned int plane,
+ unsigned int flags);
+
/**
* vb2_core_expbuf() - Export a buffer as a file descriptor.
* @q: pointer to &struct vb2_queue with videobuf2 queue.