Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SM8550

From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Wed Nov 15 2023 - 08:11:16 EST

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 14:49, Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/15/2023 4:15 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 11:51, Bibek Kumar Patro
> > <quic_bibekkum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/15/2023 3:08 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 11:22, Bibek Kumar Patro
> >>> <quic_bibekkum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11/14/2023 7:42 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 15:57, Bibek Kumar Patro
> >>>>> <quic_bibekkum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Add ACTLR data table for SM8550 along with support for
> >>>>>> same including SM8550 specific implementation operations.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >>>>>> index 578c662c7c30..0eaf6f2a2e49 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >>>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,70 @@ struct actlr_data {
> >>>>>> u32 actlr;
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +#define PRE_FETCH_1 0
> >>>>>> +#define PRE_FETCH_2 BIT(8)
> >>>>>> +#define PRE_FETCH_3 (BIT(9) | BIT(8))
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What is the difference between PRE_FETCH_3 and PRE_FETCH_2? And
> >>>>> PRE_FETCH_1? Are these real numbers that refer to some amount / count
> >>>>> or just dummy names?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No,these are not real numbers, but prefetch settings for a particular
> >>>> perfect configuration.
> >>>
> >>> Then I'd ask for some better names or descriptions.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Noted, PREFETCH_SETTING_n / PREFETCH_OPTION_n sounds like a better name
> >> in the following case. Would it be okay to use this name instead?
> >
> > Not really.
> >
>
> Any suggestion you have in mind, if not this nomenclature?

PREFETCH_something, PREFETCH_do_other_thing and PREFETCH_something_else

>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> +#define CPRE BIT(1) /* Enable context caching in the prefetch buffer */
> >>>>>> +#define CMTLB BIT(0) /* Enable context caching in the macro TLB */
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static const struct actlr_data sm8550_apps_actlr_data[] = {
> >>>>>> + { 0x18a0, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x18e0, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0800, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_1 | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1800, 0x00c0, PRE_FETCH_1 | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1820, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_1 | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1860, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_1 | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c01, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c02, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c03, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c04, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c05, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c06, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c07, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c08, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c09, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c0c, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c0d, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c0e, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x0c0f, 0x0020, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1961, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1962, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1963, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1964, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1965, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1966, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1967, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1968, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1969, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x196c, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x196d, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x196e, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x196f, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19c1, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19c2, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19c3, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19c4, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19c5, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19c6, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19c7, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19c8, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19c9, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19cc, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19cd, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19ce, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x19cf, 0x0010, PRE_FETCH_3 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1c00, 0x0002, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1c01, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_1 | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1920, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1923, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1924, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1940, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1941, 0x0004, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1943, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1944, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> + { 0x1947, 0x0000, PRE_FETCH_2 | CPRE | CMTLB },
> >>>>>> +};
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
> >>>>>> @@ -459,6 +523,16 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl sdm845_smmu_500_impl = {
> >>>>>> .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static const struct arm_smmu_impl sm8550_smmu_500_impl = {
> >>>>>> + .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
> >>>>>> + .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
> >>>>>> + .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> >>>>>> + .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> >>>>>> + .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
> >>>>>> + .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What is the difference between this one and qcom_smmu_500_impl ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Noted, will remove this and use qcom_smmu_500_impl instead.
> >>>> Thanks for pointing this out.
> >>>> Since inititally the reset ops was different to reset CPRE bit only for
> >>>> sm8550 SoC hence sm8550_smmu_500_impl is defined, but now default reset
> >>>> ops is modified to set CPRE bit for all SoCs ([PATCH v2 3/3]) so it
> >>>> should be fine to use qcom_smmu_500_impl as there's no difference now.
> >>>>
> >>>>>> +};
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
> >>>>>> .init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
> >>>>>> .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> >>>>>> @@ -522,6 +596,11 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_config qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg = {
> >>>>>> .reg_offset = qcom_smmu_impl0_reg_offset,
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +static const struct actlr_config sm8550_actlrcfg = {
> >>>>>> + .adata = sm8550_apps_actlr_data,
> >>>>>> + .size = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8550_apps_actlr_data),
> >>>>>> +};
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> /*
> >>>>>> * It is not yet possible to use MDP SMMU with the bypass quirk on the msm8996,
> >>>>>> * there are not enough context banks.
> >>>>>> @@ -545,16 +624,20 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sdm845_smmu_500_data = {
> >>>>>> /* Also no debug configuration. */
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
> >>>>>> + .impl = &sm8550_smmu_500_impl,
> >>>>>> + .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
> >>>>>> + .cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
> >>>>>> + .actlrcfg = &sm8550_actlrcfg,
> >>>>>> +};
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
> >>>>>> .impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
> >>>>>> .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
> >>>>>> .cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -/*
> >>>>>> - * Do not add any more qcom,SOC-smmu-500 entries to this list, unless they need
> >>>>>> - * special handling and can not be covered by the qcom,smmu-500 entry.
> >>>>>> - */
> >>>>>
> >>>>> NAK, leave this in place.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ack, will address this in next version.
> >>>>
> >>>>>> static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
> >>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2", .data = &msm8996_smmu_data },
> >>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
> >>>>>> @@ -579,6 +662,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
> >>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >>>>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-smmu-500", .data = &sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >>>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >>>>>> { }
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> 2.17.1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >



--
With best wishes
Dmitry