Re: [V14 3/8] drivers: perf: arm_pmuv3: Enable branch stack sampling framework

From: Anshuman Khandual
Date: Wed Nov 15 2023 - 00:45:25 EST


On 11/14/23 15:28, James Clark wrote:
>
>
> On 14/11/2023 05:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Branch stack sampling support i.e capturing branch records during execution
>> in core perf, rides along with normal HW events being scheduled on the PMU.
>> This prepares ARMV8 PMU framework for branch stack support on relevant PMUs
>> with required HW implementation.
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> - All armv8pmu_branch_xxxx() stub definitions have been moved inside
>> include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h for easy access from both arm32 and
>> arm64 platforms
>>
>
> This causes lots of W=1 build errors because the prototypes are in
> arm_pmuv3.h, but arm_brbe.c doesn't include it.

I guess these are the W=1 warnings you mentioned above.

drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:11:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_reset’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
11 | void armv8pmu_branch_reset(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:190:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_save’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
190 | void armv8pmu_branch_save(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu, void *ctx)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:236:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_attr_valid’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
236 | bool armv8pmu_branch_attr_valid(struct perf_event *event)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:269:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_alloc’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
269 | int armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_alloc(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:279:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_free’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
279 | void armv8pmu_task_ctx_cache_free(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:303:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_probe’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
303 | void armv8pmu_branch_probe(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:449:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_enable’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
449 | void armv8pmu_branch_enable(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:474:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_disable’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
474 | void armv8pmu_branch_disable(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c:717:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘armv8pmu_branch_read’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
717 | void armv8pmu_branch_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)

Branch helpers are used in ARM PMU V3 driver i.e drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c.
Whether the actual BRBE helper definitions, or their fallback stubs (when
CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE is not enabled), need to be accessible from arm_pmuv3.c
driver not from brbe.c implementations itself.

>
> It seems like the main reason you can't include arm_brbe.h in arm32 code
> is because there are a load of inline functions and references to
> registers in there. But these are only used in arm_brbe.c, so they don't

Right, arm32 should not be exposed to BRBE internals via arm_brbe.h header.

> need to be in the header anyway.

Right, these are only used in arm_brbe.c

>
> If you removed the code from the header and moved it to the source file
> you could move the brbe prototypes to the brbe header and it would be a
> bit cleaner and more idiomatic.

Alight, how about the following changes - build tested on arm32 and arm64.

- Move BRBE helpers from arm_brbe.h into arm_brbe.c
- Move armv8_pmu_xxx() declaration inside arm_brbe.h for arm64 (CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE)
- Move armv8_pmu_xxx() stub definitions inside arm_pmuv3.c for arm32 (!CONFIG_ARM64_BRBE)
- Include arm_brbe.h header both in arm_pmuv3.c and arm_brbe.c