Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] locking: Add rwsem_assert_held() and rwsem_assert_held_write()

[Waiman Long]

On 11/14/23 16:26, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 05:21:22PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> > On 11/10/23 15:41, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > >    static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > >    {
> > > -	return atomic_long_read(&sem->count) != 0;
> > > +	return atomic_long_read(&sem->count) != RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
> > >    }
> > > -#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE		0L
> > > -#define __RWSEM_COUNT_INIT(name)	.count = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE)
> > > +static inline void rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> > > +{
> > > +	WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE);
> > > +}
> > That is not correct. You mean "!= RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE". Right?
> Uhhh ... I always get confused between assert and BUG_ON being opposite
> polarity, but I think it's correct.
>
> We are asserting that the rwsem is locked (either for read or write).
> That is, it is a bug if the rwsem is unlocked.
> So WARN_ON(sem->count == UNLOCKED_VALUE) is correct.  No?
You are right. I got confused too.
> > There are some inconsistency in the use of WARN_ON() and BUG_ON() in the
> > assertions. For PREEMPT_RT, held_write is a BUG_ON. For non-PREEMPT_RT, held
> > is a BUG_ON. It is not clear why one is BUG_ON and other one is WARN_ON. Is
> > there a rationale for that?
> I'll fix that up.
The check for write lock ownership is accurate. OTOH, the locked check 
can have false positive and so is less reliable.
> > BTW, we can actually check if the current process is the write-lock owner of
> > a rwsem, but not for a reader-owned rwsem.
> We actually don't want to do that.  See patches 3/4 where I explain how
> XFS takes the XFS_ILOCK for write, then passes control to a workqueue
> which asserts that the XFS_ILOCK is held for write.  The thread which
> took the rwsem for write waits for the workqueue and unlocks the rwsem.
I see. Thanks for the explanation.

Cheers,
Longman