Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Fix %pfwf when current node refcount == 0

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 03:27:43PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 02:19:34PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:12:47 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 12:04:56PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > > > A refcount issue can appeared in __fwnode_link_del() due to the
> > > > pr_debug() call:  

---8<---

> > > >   WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 901 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xe5/0x110
> > > >   Call Trace:

> > > >   ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xe5/0x110
> 
> 	...

These are actually not needed as duplicating WARNING above.

> > > >   of_node_get+0x1e/0x30
> > > >   of_fwnode_get+0x28/0x40
> > > >   fwnode_full_name_string+0x34/0x90
> > > >   fwnode_string+0xdb/0x140
> 	...
> 
> > > >   vsnprintf+0x17b/0x630
> 	...
> > > >   __fwnode_link_del+0x25/0xa0
> > > >   fwnode_links_purge+0x39/0xb0
> > > >   of_node_release+0xd9/0x180
> 	...

---8<---

> > > Please, do not put so many unrelated lines of backtrace in the commit message.
> > > Leave only the important ones (the Submitting Patches document suggests some
> > > like ~3-5 lines only).
> > 
> > Ok, I will remove some of them.
> 
> Thanks (my suggestion is above).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko