Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: correct the error value of 'timeout'

From: Su Hui
Date: Tue Nov 14 2023 - 04:18:08 EST


On 2023/11/14 14:42, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2023 1:49 PM
To: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxx; kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: correct the error value of 'timeout'

When 'rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages <= page_thresh', 'timeout' should equal to
'page_thresh' rather than '4'. Change the code order to fix this problem.

Fixes: 614e389f36a9 ("rtl8xxxu: gen1: Set aggregation timeout (REG_RXDMA_AGG_PG_TH + 1) as well")
I think this should fix
Fixes: fd83f1227826 ("rtl8xxxu: gen1: Add module parameters to adjust DMA aggregation parameters")
Agreed. Thanks for your reminder!

Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
index 43ee7592bc6e..9cab8b1dc486 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
@@ -4757,6 +4757,12 @@ void rtl8xxxu_gen1_init_aggregation(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)
* RxAggPageTimeout = 4 or 6 (absolute time 34ms/(2^6))
*/

+ /* REG_RXDMA_AGG_PG_TH + 1 seems to be the timeout register on
+ * gen2 chips and rtl8188eu. The rtl8723au seems unhappy if we
+ * don't set it, so better set both.
+ */
+ timeout = 4;
+
page_thresh = (priv->fops->rx_agg_buf_size / 512);
if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages >= 0) {
if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages <= page_thresh)
The logic here is:

page_thresh = (priv->fops->rx_agg_buf_size / 512);
if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages >= 0) {
if (rtl8xxxu_dma_agg_pages <= page_thresh)
timeout = page_thresh;

Do you know why 'timeout = page_thresh;'? Intuitively, units of 'timeout' and
'thresh' are different. Maybe, we should correct here instead?
I don't know the reason about this. :(
I found this error because clang static checker complains about this code that value stored to 'timeout'
is never read.

Su Hui