Re: [RFC v6 0/8] DRM scheduling cgroup controller

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

>From cgroup POV, it generally looks fine to me. As before, I'm really
curious whether this is something other non-intel drivers can get behind.
Just one nit.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 05:07:19PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>  * Allowing per DRM card configuration and queries is deliberatly left out but
>    it is compatible in principle with the current proposal.
> 
>    Where today we have, for drm.weight:
> 
>    100
> 
>    We can later extend with:
> 
>    100
>    card0 80
>    card1 20
>
>    Similarly for drm.stat:
> 
>    usage_usec 1000
>    card0.usage_usec 500
>    card1.usage_usec 500

These dont't match what blkcg is doing. Please use nested keyed format
instead.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun