Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: prctl: Add prctl test for PR_GET_NAME

From: Osama Muhammad
Date: Sat Nov 11 2023 - 14:23:43 EST


On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 21:01, Osama Muhammad <osmtendev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Aug 2023 at 19:14, Osama Muhammad <osmtendev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This patch covers the testing of PR_GET_NAME by
> > reading it's value from proc/self/task/pid/comm
> > and matching it with the value returned by PR_GET_NAME.
> > If the values are matched then it's successful, otherwise
> > it fails.
Hi Shuah,
Any Feedback on this patch.

Thanks,
Osama
>

> Any Feedback on this patch?
>
> >
> > changes since v1:
> > - Handled fscanf,fopen error checking.
> > - Defined MAX_PATH_LEN.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Osama Muhammad <osmtendev@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/prctl/set-process-name.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/prctl/set-process-name.c b/tools/testing/selftests/prctl/set-process-name.c
> > index 3bc5e0e09..562f707ba 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/prctl/set-process-name.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/prctl/set-process-name.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > #define CHANGE_NAME "changename"
> > #define EMPTY_NAME ""
> > #define TASK_COMM_LEN 16
> > +#define MAX_PATH_LEN 50
> >
> > int set_name(char *name)
> > {
> > @@ -47,6 +48,35 @@ int check_null_pointer(char *check_name)
> > return res;
> > }
> >
> > +int check_name(void)
> > +{
> > +
> > + int pid;
> > +
> > + pid = getpid();
> > + FILE *fptr = NULL;
> > + char path[MAX_PATH_LEN] = {};
> > + char name[TASK_COMM_LEN] = {};
> > + char output[TASK_COMM_LEN] = {};
> > + int j;
> > +
> > + j = snprintf(path, MAX_PATH_LEN, "/proc/self/task/%d/comm", pid);
> > + fptr = fopen(path, "r");
> > + if (!fptr)
> > + return -EIO;
> > +
> > + fscanf(fptr, "%s", output);
> > + if (ferror(fptr))
> > + return -EIO;
> > +
> > + int res = prctl(PR_GET_NAME, name, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (res < 0)
> > + return -errno;
> > +
> > + return !strcmp(output, name);
> > +}
> > +
> > TEST(rename_process) {
> >
> > EXPECT_GE(set_name(CHANGE_NAME), 0);
> > @@ -57,6 +87,8 @@ TEST(rename_process) {
> >
> > EXPECT_GE(set_name(CHANGE_NAME), 0);
> > EXPECT_LT(check_null_pointer(CHANGE_NAME), 0);
> > +
> > + EXPECT_TRUE(check_name());
> > }
> >
> > TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >