Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: qcom: ipq6018: add USB GDSCs

[Robert Marko]

On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 22:51, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/31/23 10:01, Robert Marko wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 22:12, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30.10.2023 21:37, Robert Marko wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 20:37, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 29.10.2023 12:04, Robert Marko wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 12:45, Robert Marko <robimarko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> IPQ6018 has GDSC-s for each of the USB ports, so lets define them as such
> >>>>>> and drop the curent code that is de-asserting the USB GDSC-s as part of
> >>>>>> the GCC probe.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Unfortunately, after testing on multiple devices I hit the same GDSC
> >>>>> issue I had a long time ago
> >>>>> that was the reason I did not send this upstream.
> >>>>> It seems that USB3 port GDSC (USB0 GDSC in code) works just fine,
> >>>>> however the USB2 one
> >>>>> (USB1 GDSC in code) it is stuck off and USB2 port will fail due to this:
> >>>>>      1.607531] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>>>> [    1.607559] usb1_gdsc status stuck at 'off'
> >>>>> [    1.607592] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 35 at gdsc_toggle_logic+0x16c/0x174
> >>>>> [    1.615120] Modules linked in:
> >>>> Can you dump GDSCR (the entire 32-bit register) at boot and when toggling?
> >>>
> >>> Sure, here it is:
> >>> [    0.023760] qcom,gcc-ipq6018 1800000.gcc: reg: 0x3e078 val: 0x8222004 init
> >>> [    0.023782] qcom,gcc-ipq6018 1800000.gcc: reg: 0x3f078 val: 0x8222004 init
> >>> [    0.988626] qcom,gcc-ipq6018 1800000.gcc: reg: 0x3f078 val:
> >>> 0x8282000 before toggle
> >>> [    1.202506] qcom,gcc-ipq6018 1800000.gcc: reg: 0x3f078 val:
> >>> 0x8282000 after toggle
> >>> [    1.207208] qcom,gcc-ipq6018 1800000.gcc: reg: 0x3e078 val:
> >>> 0xa0282000 before toggle
> >> Any chance
> >>
> >> .en_few_wait_val = 0x2
> >>
> >> (turning BIT(19) into BIT(17))
> >>
> >> will make a difference?
> >
> > Sadly, it makes no difference and GDSC status bit newer comes up which is
> > rather weird as USB0 one seems to work just fine.
> What if you add clk_ignore_unused?

To the USB1 master clock or?

There is definitively something broken regarding the GDSC as
GDSC_STATE bits (30-27)
change from 0 to something on the USB0 GDSC but on GDSC1 they are 0 even after
SW_OVERRIDE BIT(2) is set to 1, and the POWER BIT(31) newer changes to 1.

However, if you manually set BIT(2) to 1 then the USB1 master clock
can come up so
GDSC seems to work.
USB1 (The USB2.0 HS) port is still broken after this if USB mass storage is used
but that was present before the GDSC changes as well and I still need
to figure out
which quirk is missing for this.

Regards,
Robert

>
> Konrad