[PATCH v2] platform/chrome: sensorhub: Fix typos

[Kuan-Wei Chiu]

Replace 'preceeds' with 'precedes' in the comment.
Replace 'porod' with 'period' in the comment.
Replace 'noone' with 'no one' in the comment.
Replace 'lantency' with 'latency' in the comment.
Replace 'kifo' with 'kfifo' in the comment.
Replace 'change' with 'chance' in the comment.

Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v1 -> v2:
 * Separate patch series into two patches.

 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
index 71948dade0e2..9e17f7483ca0 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sensorhub_ring.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cros_ec_sensorhub_unregister_push_data);
  * @sensorhub: Sensor Hub object
  * @on: true when events are requested.
  *
- * To be called before sleeping or when noone is listening.
+ * To be called before sleeping or when no one is listening.
  * Return: 0 on success, or an error when we can not communicate with the EC.
  *
  */
@@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ static s64 cros_ec_sensor_ring_median(s64 *array, size_t length)
  *
  * While a and b are recorded at accurate times (due to the EC real time
  * nature); c is pretty untrustworthy, even though it's recorded the
- * first thing in ec_irq_handler(). There is a very good change we'll get
- * added lantency due to:
+ * first thing in ec_irq_handler(). There is a very good chance we'll get
+ * added latency due to:
  *   other irqs
  *   ddrfreq
  *   cpuidle
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ cros_ec_sensor_ring_process_event(struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub,
  *                                 ringbuffer.
  *
  * This is the new spreading code, assumes every sample's timestamp
- * preceeds the sample. Run if tight_timestamps == true.
+ * precedes the sample. Run if tight_timestamps == true.
  *
  * Sometimes the EC receives only one interrupt (hence timestamp) for
  * a batch of samples. Only the first sample will have the correct
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ cros_ec_sensor_ring_spread_add(struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub,
 			} else {
 				/*
 				 * Push first sample in the batch to the,
-				 * kifo, it's guaranteed to be correct, the
+				 * kfifo, it's guaranteed to be correct, the
 				 * rest will follow later on.
 				 */
 				sample_idx = 1;
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ cros_ec_sensor_ring_spread_add(struct cros_ec_sensorhub *sensorhub,
  *           last_out -->
  *
  *
- * We spread time for the samples using perod p = (current - TS1)/4.
+ * We spread time for the samples using period p = (current - TS1)/4.
  * between TS1 and TS2: [TS1+p/4, TS1+2p/4, TS1+3p/4, current_timestamp].
  *
  */
-- 
2.25.1