Re: [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when numa balancing

From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Date: Fri Nov 10 2023 - 13:09:42 EST


"zhangpeng (AS)" <zhangpeng362@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi everyone,
>
> There is a performance issue that has been bothering us recently.
> This problem can reproduce in the latest mainline version (Linux 6.6).
>
> We use mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE) in the user mode process
> to avoid performance problems caused by major fault.
>
> There is a stage in numa fault which will set pte as 0 in do_numa_page() :
> ptep_modify_prot_start() will clear the vmf->pte, until
> ptep_modify_prot_commit() assign a value to the vmf->pte.
>
> For the data segment of the user-mode program, the global variable area
> is a private mapping. After the pagecache is loaded, the private
> anonymous page is generated after the COW is triggered. Mlockall can
> lock COW pages (anonymous pages), but the original file pages cannot
> be locked and may be reclaimed. If the global variable (private anon page)
> is accessed when vmf->pte is zero which is concurrently set by numa fault,
> a file page fault will be triggered.
>
> At this time, the original private file page may have been reclaimed.
> If the page cache is not available at this time, a major fault will be
> triggered and the file will be read, causing additional overhead.
>
> Our problem scenario is as follows:
>
> task 1 task 2
> ------ ------
> /* scan global variables */
> do_numa_page()
> spin_lock(vmf->ptl)
> ptep_modify_prot_start()
> /* set vmf->pte as null */
> /* Access global variables */
> handle_pte_fault()
> /* no pte lock */
> do_pte_missing()
> do_fault()
> do_read_fault()
> ptep_modify_prot_commit()
> /* ptep update done */
> pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl)
> do_fault_around()
> __do_fault()
> filemap_fault()
> /* page cache is not available
> and a major fault is triggered */
> do_sync_mmap_readahead()
> /* page_not_uptodate and goto
> out_retry. */
>
> Is there any way to avoid such a major fault?
>

This is also true w.r.t change_pte_range() in addition to do_numa_page()
?

-aneesh