Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: remove duplicated argument

From: Alex Deucher
Date: Wed Nov 08 2023 - 14:01:50 EST


Applied. Thanks!

On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 3:52 AM José Pekkarinen
<jose.pekkarinen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2023-10-30 15:54, Aurabindo Pillai wrote:
> > On 10/29/2023 5:39 AM, José Pekkarinen wrote:
> >> Spotted by coccicheck, there is a redundant check for
> >> v->SourcePixelFormat[k] != dm_444_16. This patch will
> >> remove it. The corresponding output follows.
> >>
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn30/display_mode_vba_30.c:5130:86-122:
> >> duplicated argument to && or ||
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: José Pekkarinen <jose.pekkarinen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn30/display_mode_vba_30.c | 2
> >> +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git
> >> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn30/display_mode_vba_30.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn30/display_mode_vba_30.c
> >> index ad741a723c0e..3686f1e7de3a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn30/display_mode_vba_30.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn30/display_mode_vba_30.c
> >> @@ -5128,7 +5128,7 @@ void
> >> dml30_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib
> >> *mode_l
> >> ViewportExceedsSurface = true;
> >> if (v->SourcePixelFormat[k] != dm_444_64 &&
> >> v->SourcePixelFormat[k] != dm_444_32 && v->SourcePixelFormat[k] !=
> >> dm_444_16
> >> - && v->SourcePixelFormat[k] != dm_444_16 &&
> >> v->SourcePixelFormat[k] != dm_444_8 && v->SourcePixelFormat[k] !=
> >> dm_rgbe) {
> >> + && v->SourcePixelFormat[k] != dm_444_8 && v->SourcePixelFormat[k]
> >> != dm_rgbe) {
> >> if (v->ViewportWidthChroma[k] > v->SurfaceWidthC[k] ||
> >> v->ViewportHeightChroma[k] > v->SurfaceHeightC[k]) {
> >> ViewportExceedsSurface = true;
> >> }
> >
> > Thanks for catching.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@xxxxxxx>
>
> Sorry to bring this up, I just wanted to check whether this
> has been applied in the following pulls or not.
>
> Thanks!
>
> José.