Re: [PATCH] mm:hugetlb_cgroup: Fix the wrong format specifier

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Nov 07 2023 - 11:33:29 EST


On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 16:27:23 +0800 zhaimingbing <zhaimingbing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The long type should use "%ld" instead of "%lu".
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ static int __hugetlb_events_show(struct seq_file *seq, bool local)
> else
> max = atomic_long_read(&h_cg->events[idx][HUGETLB_MAX]);
>
> - seq_printf(seq, "max %lu\n", max);
> + seq_printf(seq, "max %ld\n", max);
>
> return 0;
> }

Well. We can't have a negative number of events. If we had an
atomic_ulong_t, we'd be using that for ->events[].

Perhaps giving `max' an unsigned long type would better represent the
intent in there.