Re: [PATCH v1 05/12] tracefs: add TP_printk_no_nl - RFC

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Mon Nov 06 2023 - 20:40:46 EST


On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 21:40:13 -0600
jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Steve,
> IIRC you considered adding \n where needed.
> is there anything gained (conceivably) by not just adding the trailing
> \n when "needed" ?
> statistically, macros could get us to 99.99+ "compliance"
> IIRC - the "needed" seems correct.
>

I replied to the next patch suggesting to do this on the read side.

-- Steve