Re: [RESEND PATCH] dt-bindings: crypto: qcom,prng: Add SM8450

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/11/2023 18:05, Elliot Berman wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/5/2023 5:03 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/11/2023 23:52, Elliot Berman wrote:
>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> SM8450's PRNG does not require a core clock reference. Add a new
>>> compatible with a qcom,prng-ee fallback and handle that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> I noticed this patch got missed while running make dtbs_check. No
>>> changes to this patch from the original version:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/2c208796-5ad6-c362-dabc-1228b978ca1d@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>>
>>
>> I don't understand why do you send this. This is not a correct patch,
>> was rejected. Different patch was already merged.
> 
> I see that 6.6 has
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi?h=v6.6#n1741
> 
> but bindings not updated:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,prng.yaml?h=v6.6
> 
> I came up with similar-ish fix offline, then found Konrad had posted the patch when searching lore.
> I didn't find any other patch on lore. 
> 
> I think you rejected a proposal to drop "p" from "prng", but this patch
> doesn't do that and we stayed course with naming scheme.

Please start working on linux-next, not on the last kernel release.

Best regards,
Krzysztof