On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 02:25:25PM +0800, Jie Luo wrote:
On 11/3/2023 9:01 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
#define QCA8081_PHY_ID 0x004dd101
+#define QCA8081_PHY_MASK 0xffffff00
That is an unusual mask. Please check it is correct. All you should
need its PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT, PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL, PHY_ID_MATCH_VENDOR.
Thanks Andrew for the review.
The PHY ID of qca8084 is correct, i will update to use PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT in
the new added entry for qca8084.
Note, i asked about the mask, not the ID. Is PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT maybe
too exact? Is there the option for different revisions of the PHY? Can
one entry in the table be used for multiple revisions?
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr