Re: [RFC 1/2] refcount: introduce generic lockptr funcs

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Nov 03 2023 - 14:54:36 EST


On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 12:16:34PM -0400, Alexander Aring wrote:

> diff --git a/lib/refcount.c b/lib/refcount.c
> index a207a8f22b3c..e28678f0f473 100644
> --- a/lib/refcount.c
> +++ b/lib/refcount.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,34 @@ bool refcount_dec_not_one(refcount_t *r)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_not_one);
>
> +bool refcount_dec_and_lockptr(refcount_t *r, void (*lock)(void *lockptr),
> + void (*unlock)(void *lockptr), void *lockptr)
> +{
> + if (refcount_dec_not_one(r))
> + return false;
> +
> + lock(lockptr);
> + if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) {
> + unlock(lockptr);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_lockptr);

This is terrible, you're forcing indirect calls on everything.