Hi Neil,
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 05:03:46PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
[...]
+static int goodix_berlin_get_ic_info(struct goodix_berlin_core *cd)
+{
+ __le16 length_raw;
+ u8 *afe_data;
+ u16 length;
+ int error;
+
+ afe_data = kzalloc(GOODIX_BERLIN_IC_INFO_MAX_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!afe_data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ error = regmap_raw_read(cd->regmap, GOODIX_BERLIN_IC_INFO_ADDR,
+ &length_raw, sizeof(length_raw));
+ if (error) {
+ dev_info(cd->dev, "failed get ic info length, %d\n", error);
This should be dev_err().
+ goto free_afe_data;
+ }
+
+ length = le16_to_cpu(length_raw);
+ if (length >= GOODIX_BERLIN_IC_INFO_MAX_LEN) {
+ dev_info(cd->dev, "invalid ic info length %d\n", length);
And here.
+ error = -EINVAL;
+ goto free_afe_data;
+ }
+
+ error = regmap_raw_read(cd->regmap, GOODIX_BERLIN_IC_INFO_ADDR,
+ afe_data, length);
+ if (error) {
+ dev_info(cd->dev, "failed get ic info data, %d\n", error);
+ return error;
+ goto free_afe_data;
+ }
This return statement is left over from v9; the print should also be dev_err().
+
+ /* check whether the data is valid (ex. bus default values) */
+ if (goodix_berlin_is_dummy_data(cd, afe_data, length)) {
+ dev_err(cd->dev, "fw info data invalid\n");
+ error = -EINVAL;
+ goto free_afe_data;
+ }
+
+ if (!goodix_berlin_checksum_valid(afe_data, length)) {
+ dev_info(cd->dev, "fw info checksum error\n");
And here.
+ error = -EINVAL;
+ goto free_afe_data;
+ }
+
+ error = goodix_berlin_convert_ic_info(cd, afe_data, length);
+ if (error)
+ goto free_afe_data;
+
+ /* check some key info */
+ if (!cd->touch_data_addr) {
+ dev_err(cd->dev, "touch_data_addr is null\n");
+ error = -EINVAL;
+ goto free_afe_data;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+free_afe_data:
+ kfree(afe_data);
+
+ return error;
+}
[...]
+static int goodix_berlin_request_handle_reset(struct goodix_berlin_core *cd)
+{
+ gpiod_set_value(cd->reset_gpio, 1);
+ usleep_range(2000, 2100);
+ gpiod_set_value(cd->reset_gpio, 0);
I see that now, this function is only called if the reset GPIO is defined,
but there used to be another msleep() here that has since been dropped. Is
that intentional?
+
+ return 0;
+}
Kind regards,
Jeff LaBundy