Re: [PATCH] cgroup/rstat: Reduce cpu_lock hold time in cgroup_rstat_flush_locked()

From: Yosry Ahmed
Date: Wed Nov 01 2023 - 15:12:27 EST


On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 9:09 AM Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When cgroup_rstat_updated() isn't being called concurrently with
> cgroup_rstat_flush_locked(), its run time is pretty short. When
> both are called concurrently, the cgroup_rstat_updated() run time
> can spike to a pretty high value due to high cpu_lock hold time in
> cgroup_rstat_flush_locked(). This can be problematic if the task calling
> cgroup_rstat_updated() is a realtime task running on an isolated CPU
> with a strict latency requirement. The cgroup_rstat_updated() call can
> happens when there is a page fault even though the task is running in
> user space most of the time.
>
> The percpu cpu_lock is used to protect the update tree -
> updated_next and updated_children. This protection is only needed
> when cgroup_rstat_cpu_pop_updated() is being called. The subsequent
> flushing operation which can take a much longer time does not need
> that protection.
>
> To reduce the cpu_lock hold time, we need to perform all the
> cgroup_rstat_cpu_pop_updated() calls up front with the lock
> released afterward before doing any flushing. This patch adds a new
> cgroup_rstat_flush_list() function to do just that and return a singly
> linked list of cgroup_rstat_cpu structures to be flushed.
>
> By adding some instrumentation code to measure the maximum elapsed times
> of the new cgroup_rstat_flush_list() function and each cpu iteration
> of cgroup_rstat_flush_locked() around the old cpu_lock lock/unlock pair
> on a 2-socket x86-64 server running parallel kernel build, the maximum
> elapsed times are 31us and 118us respectively. The maximum cpu_lock
> hold time is now reduced to about 1/4 of the original.

This sounds promising. It's smart to empty the whole tree while
holding the lock, then do the flush only under cgroup_rstat_lock.
Thanks for doing this.

>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/cgroup-defs.h | 7 +++++
> kernel/cgroup/rstat.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h b/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
> index 265da00a1a8b..22adb94ebb74 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
> @@ -368,6 +368,13 @@ struct cgroup_rstat_cpu {
> */
> struct cgroup *updated_children; /* terminated by self cgroup */
> struct cgroup *updated_next; /* NULL iff not on the list */
> +
> + /*
> + * A singly-linked list of cgroup_rstat_cpu structures to be flushed.
> + * Protected by cgroup_rstat_lock.
> + */
> + struct cgroup_rstat_cpu *flush_next;
> + struct cgroup *cgroup; /* Cgroup back pointer */

Why are we linking struct cgroup_rstat_cpu instead of directly linking
struct cgroup? AFAICT we only ever use the cgroup back pointer during
flushing anyway, right?

Given that only one cpu can be flushed at a time, I think it should be
okay to run the list directly through struct cgroup, and have all cpus
reuse it. That pointer would essentially be scratch space for the
flushing code to use. This should also save a bit of memory:
O(cgroups) vs O(cgroups * cpus). It's not a lot either way though.

I think this may also simplify the code a bit.

> };
>
> struct cgroup_freezer_state {
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> index d80d7a608141..93ef2795a68d 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,42 @@ static struct cgroup *cgroup_rstat_cpu_pop_updated(struct cgroup *pos,
> return pos;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Return a list of cgroup_rstat_cpu structures to be flushed
> + */
> +static struct cgroup_rstat_cpu *cgroup_rstat_flush_list(struct cgroup *root,

nit: the name sounds like the function will flush a list, rather than
return a list of cgroups to be flushed. What about
cgroup_rstat_updated_list?

> + int cpu)
> +{
> + raw_spinlock_t *cpu_lock = per_cpu_ptr(&cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock, cpu);
> + struct cgroup_rstat_cpu *head = NULL, *tail, *next;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct cgroup *pos;
> +
> + /*
> + * The _irqsave() is needed because cgroup_rstat_lock is
> + * spinlock_t which is a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT. Acquiring
> + * this lock with the _irq() suffix only disables interrupts on
> + * a non-PREEMPT_RT kernel. The raw_spinlock_t below disables
> + * interrupts on both configurations. The _irqsave() ensures
> + * that interrupts are always disabled and later restored.
> + */
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(cpu_lock, flags);
> + pos = cgroup_rstat_cpu_pop_updated(NULL, root, cpu);
> + if (!pos)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + head = tail = cgroup_rstat_cpu(pos, cpu);
> + while ((pos = cgroup_rstat_cpu_pop_updated(pos, root, cpu))) {
> + next = cgroup_rstat_cpu(pos, cpu);
> + tail->flush_next = next;
> + tail = next;
> + }
> + tail->flush_next = NULL;
> +unlock:
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(cpu_lock, flags);
> + return head;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * A hook for bpf stat collectors to attach to and flush their stats.
> * Together with providing bpf kfuncs for cgroup_rstat_updated() and
> @@ -179,23 +215,14 @@ static void cgroup_rstat_flush_locked(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_rstat_lock);
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - raw_spinlock_t *cpu_lock = per_cpu_ptr(&cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock,
> - cpu);
> - struct cgroup *pos = NULL;
> - unsigned long flags;
> + struct cgroup_rstat_cpu *rstat_cpu_next;
>
> - /*
> - * The _irqsave() is needed because cgroup_rstat_lock is
> - * spinlock_t which is a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT. Acquiring
> - * this lock with the _irq() suffix only disables interrupts on
> - * a non-PREEMPT_RT kernel. The raw_spinlock_t below disables
> - * interrupts on both configurations. The _irqsave() ensures
> - * that interrupts are always disabled and later restored.
> - */
> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(cpu_lock, flags);
> - while ((pos = cgroup_rstat_cpu_pop_updated(pos, cgrp, cpu))) {
> + rstat_cpu_next = cgroup_rstat_flush_list(cgrp, cpu);
> + while (rstat_cpu_next) {
> + struct cgroup *pos = rstat_cpu_next->cgroup;
> struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
>
> + rstat_cpu_next = rstat_cpu_next->flush_next;
> cgroup_base_stat_flush(pos, cpu);
> bpf_rstat_flush(pos, cgroup_parent(pos), cpu);
>
> @@ -205,7 +232,6 @@ static void cgroup_rstat_flush_locked(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> css->ss->css_rstat_flush(css, cpu);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(cpu_lock, flags);
>
> /* play nice and yield if necessary */
> if (need_resched() || spin_needbreak(&cgroup_rstat_lock)) {
> @@ -281,6 +307,7 @@ int cgroup_rstat_init(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> struct cgroup_rstat_cpu *rstatc = cgroup_rstat_cpu(cgrp, cpu);
>
> rstatc->updated_children = cgrp;
> + rstatc->cgroup = cgrp;
> u64_stats_init(&rstatc->bsync);
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.3
>
>