Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] dt-bindings: leds: aw200xx: fix led pattern and add reg constraints

[Dmitry Rokosov]

Hello Conor,

On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 04:17:14PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 11:04:16AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 01 Nov 2023 17:24:45 +0300, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> > > AW200XX controllers have the capability to declare more than 0xf LEDs,
> > > therefore, it is necessary to accept LED names using an appropriate
> > > regex pattern.
> > > 
> > > The register offsets can be adjusted within the specified range, with
> > > the maximum value corresponding to the highest number of LEDs that can
> > > be connected to the controller.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: e338a05e76ca ("dt-bindings: leds: Add binding for AW200xx")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/leds/awinic,aw200xx.yaml         | 64 +++++++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> > 
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > 
> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/awinic,aw200xx.example.dtb: led-controller@3a: led@0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg' was unexpected)
> > 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/awinic,aw200xx.yaml#
> > /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/awinic,aw200xx.example.dtb: led-controller@3a: led@1: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg' was unexpected)
> > 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/awinic,aw200xx.yaml#
> > /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/awinic,aw200xx.example.dtb: led-controller@3a: led@2: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg' was unexpected)
> > 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/awinic,aw200xx.yaml#
> 
> Looks like you need to drop the second part of this hunk from the patch.
> @@ -45,17 +45,12 @@ properties:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
>  patternProperties:
> -  "^led@[0-9a-f]$":
> +  "^led@[0-9a-f]+$":
>      type: object
>      $ref: common.yaml#
>      unevaluatedProperties: false
>  
>      properties:
> -      reg:
> -        description:
> -          LED number
> -        maxItems: 1
> -
>        led-max-microamp:
>          default: 9780
>          description: |
> 
> Each LED still only has one reg entry, right?

You're right... the maxItems for 'reg' is still needed. I'll back it in
the next version.
But I don't understand, why my dt_binding_check run doesn't show me this
problem... I don't specify DT_CHECKER_FLAGS, maybe this is a root cause.

-- 
Thank you,
Dmitry