Re: [net-next PATCH v2 1/2] net: phy: aquantia: add firmware load support

[Christian Marangi]

On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 05:57:50PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 01.11.2023 13:57, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 02:01:33PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >> On 01.11.2023 13:36, Christian Marangi wrote:
> >>> From: Robert Marko <robimarko@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Aquantia PHY-s require firmware to be loaded before they start operating.
> >>> It can be automatically loaded in case when there is a SPI-NOR connected
> >>> to Aquantia PHY-s or can be loaded from the host via MDIO.
> >>>
> >>> This patch adds support for loading the firmware via MDIO as in most cases
> >>> there is no SPI-NOR being used to save on cost.
> >>> Firmware loading code itself is ported from mainline U-boot with cleanups.
> >>>
> >>> The firmware has mixed values both in big and little endian.
> >>> PHY core itself is big-endian but it expects values to be in little-endian.
> >>> The firmware is little-endian but CRC-16 value for it is stored at the end
> >>> of firmware in big-endian.
> >>>
> >>> It seems the PHY does the conversion internally from firmware that is
> >>> little-endian to the PHY that is big-endian on using the mailbox
> >>> but mailbox returns a big-endian CRC-16 to verify the written data
> >>> integrity.
> >>>
> >>> Co-developed-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes v2:
> >>> - Move out of RFC
> >>> - Address sanity check for offsets
> >>> - Add additional comments on firmware load check
> >>> - Fix some typo
> >>> - Capitalize CRC in comments
> >>> - Rename load_sysfs to load_fs
> >>>
> >>
> >> To make the driver better maintainable: can the firmware handling code
> >> be placed in a separate source code file, similar to what has been done
> >> for the hwmon part?
> >> If yes, then this could also be the right time to move the aquantia
> >> driver to an own subdirectory.
> >>
> > 
> > Sure! Np for me just is it really worth it? hwmod is a bigger one but
> > this is really a few functions.
> > 
> r8169_firmware.c is even smaller and I've never regretted having it factored
> out. Whether it makes sense depends on how much you share with the main module
> and how the API is structured that you provide to the main module.
> So I don't say you have to do it, I'm just saying it's worth considering it.
>

Already done! Will be part of this series with v3 :D

> > Anyway if requested, I will move in v3 the driver to a dedicated
> > directory and move the function to a separate file!
> > 
> 

-- 
	Ansuel