Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: realtek: Add GPIO support for RTD SoC variants

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 01/11/2023 03:58, Tzuyi Chang wrote:
> This commit adds GPIO support for Realtek DHC RTD SoCs.

Please do not use "This commit/patch", but imperative mood. See longer
explanation here:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95

> 
> This driver enables configuration of GPIO direction, GPIO values, GPIO
> debounce settings and handles GPIO interrupts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tzuyi Chang <tychang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

...

> +
> +static int rtd_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct rtd_gpio *data;
> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
> +	struct device_node *node;
> +	int ret;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +	match = of_match_node(rtd_gpio_of_matches, pdev->dev.of_node);
> +	if (!match || !match->data)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	data->assert_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> +	if (!data->assert_irq)
> +		goto deferred;
> +
> +	data->deassert_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 1);
> +	if (!data->deassert_irq)
> +		goto deferred;

So this goes to cleanup path...

> +
> +	data->info = match->data;
> +	spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
> +
> +	data->base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> +	if (!data->base)
> +		return -ENXIO;

But this does not? What?

> +
> +	data->irq_base = of_iomap(node, 1);
> +	if (!data->irq_base)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	data->gpio_chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
> +	data->gpio_chip.label = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> +	data->gpio_chip.of_gpio_n_cells = 2;
> +	data->gpio_chip.base = data->info->gpio_base;
> +	data->gpio_chip.ngpio = data->info->num_gpios;
> +	data->gpio_chip.request = rtd_gpio_request;
> +	data->gpio_chip.free = rtd_gpio_free;
> +	data->gpio_chip.get_direction = rtd_gpio_get_direction;
> +	data->gpio_chip.direction_input = rtd_gpio_direction_input;
> +	data->gpio_chip.direction_output = rtd_gpio_direction_output;
> +	data->gpio_chip.set = rtd_gpio_set;
> +	data->gpio_chip.get = rtd_gpio_get;
> +	data->gpio_chip.set_config = rtd_gpio_set_config;
> +	data->gpio_chip.to_irq = rtd_gpio_to_irq;
> +	data->irq_chip = rtd_gpio_irq_chip;
> +	data->irq_chip.name = data->info->name;
> +
> +	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &data->gpio_chip, data);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Adding GPIO chip failed (%d)\n", ret);

And here no cleanup? It's some random choice.

> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	data->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, data->gpio_chip.ngpio,
> +				&irq_domain_simple_ops, data);
> +	if (!data->domain) {
> +		devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, data);

NAK, test your patch.

> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < data->gpio_chip.ngpio; i++) {
> +		int irq = irq_create_mapping(data->domain, i);
> +
> +		irq_set_chip_data(irq, data);
> +		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &data->irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
> +	}
> +
> +	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(data->assert_irq, rtd_gpio_assert_irq_handle, data);
> +	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(data->deassert_irq, rtd_gpio_deassert_irq_handle, data);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "probed\n");

Nop, drop all silly, simple entry/exit messages.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +deferred:
> +	devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, data);

NAK, test your patch.

> +	return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver rtd_gpio_platform_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "gpio-rtd",
> +		.of_match_table = rtd_gpio_of_matches,
> +	},
> +	.probe = rtd_gpio_probe,
> +};
> +
> +static int rtd_gpio_init(void)
> +{
> +	return platform_driver_register(&rtd_gpio_platform_driver);
> +}
> +
> +subsys_initcall(rtd_gpio_init);
> +
> +static void __exit rtd_gpio_exit(void)
> +{
> +	platform_driver_unregister(&rtd_gpio_platform_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(rtd_gpio_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Realtek DHC SoC gpio driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

Best regards,
Krzysztof