Re: [PATCH v5 13/44] i2c: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

[Wolfram Sang]

On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:01:47PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:50:18PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > those drivers using them.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In RFC v1, you agreed to drop PARPORT [1]. Is there a reason you haven't
> done this so far?
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20211227164317.4146918-11-schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Shall I apply this with or without PARPORT?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature