Re: [PATCH] mm: Fixed multiple typos in multiple files

[Muhammad Muzammil]

Can anyone approve this patch?

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:27 AM James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2023-10-15 at 10:45 +0500, Muhammad Muzammil wrote:
> > should I create the v2 or this patch is fine?
>
> Personally, I don't think anyone cares about misspellings unless it
> obscures the meaning of the sentence, so, given the interactions in
> this thread, I'd argue the only one really worth fixing is relay ->
> relies.
>
> James
>
>
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 9:27 PM James Bottomley
> > <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2023-10-14 at 16:45 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:31:35AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > > >         /*
> > > > > > -        * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption
> > > > > > becase they never
> > > > > > +        * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption
> > > > > > because they never
> > > > > >          * update their counter from in-interrupt context.
> > > > > > For
> > > > > > these two
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know what that (partial) sentence is trying to say...
> > > > > Maybe someone else does.
> > > >
> > > > s/relay/rely/
> > >
> > > relies, surely, being the correct third person singular form of the
> > > verb to match the nominative noun "the caller".
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> >
>