Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: add an error code check in virtqueue_resize

[Su Hui]

On 2023/10/23 10:26, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > > > Well, what are the cases where it can happen practically?
> > > Device error. Such as vp_active_vq()
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > Hmm interesting. OK. But do callers know to recover?
>
> No.
>
> So I think WARN + broken is suitable.
>
> Thanks.
Sorry for the late, is the following code okay?

@@ -2739,7 +2739,7 @@ int virtqueue_resize(struct virtqueue *_vq, u32 num,
                     void (*recycle)(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf))
 {
        struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
-       int err;
+       int err, err_reset;
 
        if (num > vq->vq.num_max)
                return -E2BIG;
@@ -2759,7 +2759,15 @@ int virtqueue_resize(struct virtqueue *_vq, u32 num,
        else
                err = virtqueue_resize_split(_vq, num);

-       return virtqueue_enable_after_reset(_vq);
+       err_reset = virtqueue_enable_after_reset(_vq);
+
+       if (err) {
+               vq->broken = true;
+               WARN_ON(err_reset);
+               return err;
+       }
+
+       return err_reset;
 }

Thanks.
Su Hui