Re: [PATCH] seq_buf: fix a misleading comment

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:38:49 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The comment for seq_buf_has_overflowed() says that an overflow condition is
> marked by len == size, but that's not what the code is testing.  Make the
> comment match reality.
> 

I guess we can add:

Fixes: 8cd709ae7658a ("tracing: Have seq_buf use full buffer")

Thanks!

-- Steve

> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/seq_buf.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/seq_buf.h b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
> index 515d7fcb9634..026302765494 100644
> --- a/include/linux/seq_buf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ seq_buf_init(struct seq_buf *s, char *buf, unsigned int size)
>  
>  /*
>   * seq_buf have a buffer that might overflow. When this happens
> - * the len and size are set to be equal.
> + * len is set to be greater than size.
>   */
>  static inline bool
>  seq_buf_has_overflowed(struct seq_buf *s)