Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] drivers/perf: add DesignWare PCIe PMU driver

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Fri Oct 20 2023 - 12:49:49 EST


On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:42:29 +0800
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This commit adds the PCIe Performance Monitoring Unit (PMU) driver support
> for T-Head Yitian SoC chip. Yitian is based on the Synopsys PCI Express
> Core controller IP which provides statistics feature. The PMU is a PCIe
> configuration space register block provided by each PCIe Root Port in a
> Vendor-Specific Extended Capability named RAS D.E.S (Debug, Error
> injection, and Statistics).
>
> To facilitate collection of statistics the controller provides the
> following two features for each Root Port:
>
> - one 64-bit counter for Time Based Analysis (RX/TX data throughput and
> time spent in each low-power LTSSM state) and
> - one 32-bit counter for Event Counting (error and non-error events for
> a specified lane)
>
> Note: There is no interrupt for counter overflow.
>
> This driver adds PMU devices for each PCIe Root Port. And the PMU device is
> named based the BDF of Root Port. For example,
>
> 30:03.0 PCI bridge: Device 1ded:8000 (rev 01)
>
> the PMU device name for this Root Port is dwc_rootport_3018.
>
> Example usage of counting PCIe RX TLP data payload (Units of bytes)::
>
> $# perf stat -a -e dwc_rootport_3018/Rx_PCIe_TLP_Data_Payload/
>
> average RX bandwidth can be calculated like this:
>
> PCIe TX Bandwidth = Rx_PCIe_TLP_Data_Payload / Measure_Time_Window
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
LGTM other than some really trivial stuff inline if you are doing a v10

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>


> +static int dwc_pcie_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *plat_dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
> + struct dwc_pcie_pmu *pcie_pmu;
> + bool notify = false;
> + char *name;
> + u32 bdf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Match the rootport with VSEC_RAS_DES_ID, and register a PMU for it */
> + for_each_pci_dev(pdev) {
> + u16 vsec;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + if (!(pci_is_pcie(pdev) &&
> + pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT))
> + continue;
> +
> + vsec = pci_find_vsec_capability(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_ALIBABA,
> + DWC_PCIE_VSEC_RAS_DES_ID);
> + if (!vsec)
> + continue;
> +
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, vsec + PCI_VNDR_HEADER, &val);
> + if (PCI_VNDR_HEADER_REV(val) != 0x04)
> + continue;
> + pci_dbg(pdev,
> + "Detected PCIe Vendor-Specific Extended Capability RAS DES\n");
> +
> + bdf = PCI_DEVID(pdev->bus->number, pdev->devfn);
> + name = devm_kasprintf(&plat_dev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "dwc_rootport_%x",
> + bdf);
> + if (!name) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* All checks passed, go go go */
> + pcie_pmu = devm_kzalloc(&plat_dev->dev, sizeof(*pcie_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pcie_pmu) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + pcie_pmu->pdev = pdev;
> + pcie_pmu->ras_des_offset = vsec;
> + pcie_pmu->nr_lanes = pcie_get_width_cap(pdev);
> + pcie_pmu->on_cpu = -1;
> + pcie_pmu->pmu = (struct pmu){
> + .module = THIS_MODULE,
> + .attr_groups = dwc_pcie_attr_groups,
> + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
> + .task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context,
> + .event_init = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_init,
> + .add = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_add,
> + .del = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_del,
> + .start = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_start,
> + .stop = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_stop,
> + .read = dwc_pcie_pmu_event_update,
> + };
> +
> + /* Add this instance to the list used by the offline callback */
> + ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance(dwc_pcie_pmu_hp_state,
> + &pcie_pmu->cpuhp_node);
> + if (ret) {
> + pci_err(pdev,
> + "Error %d registering hotplug @%x\n", ret, bdf);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Unwind when platform driver removes */
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(
> + &plat_dev->dev, dwc_pcie_pmu_remove_cpuhp_instance,
> + &pcie_pmu->cpuhp_node);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + ret = perf_pmu_register(&pcie_pmu->pmu, name, -1);
> + if (ret) {
> + pci_err(pdev,
> + "Error %d registering PMU @%x\n", ret, bdf);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Cache PMU to handle pci device hotplug */
> + list_add(&pcie_pmu->pmu_node, &dwc_pcie_pmu_head);
> + pcie_pmu->registered = true;
> + notify = true;
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(
> + &plat_dev->dev, dwc_pcie_pmu_unregister_pmu, pcie_pmu);

line wrapping is a bit ugly - I would move the &plat_dev->dev to previous line.
and I think you can get away with aligning the rest just after the (


> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (notify && !bus_register_notifier(&pci_bus_type, &dwc_pcie_pmu_nb))
> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(
> + &plat_dev->dev, dwc_pcie_pmu_unregister_nb, NULL);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out:
> + pci_dev_put(pdev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}



> +static int __init dwc_pcie_pmu_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
> + "perf/dwc_pcie_pmu:online",
> + dwc_pcie_pmu_online_cpu,
> + dwc_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + dwc_pcie_pmu_hp_state = ret;
> +
> + ret = platform_driver_register(&dwc_pcie_pmu_driver);
> + if (ret)
> + goto platform_driver_register_err;
> +
> + dwc_pcie_pmu_dev = platform_device_register_simple(
> + "dwc_pcie_pmu", PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, NULL, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(dwc_pcie_pmu_dev)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(dwc_pcie_pmu_dev);
> + goto platform_device_register_error;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +platform_device_register_error:

Trivial but I'd standardize on err or error, not mix them.

> + platform_driver_unregister(&dwc_pcie_pmu_driver);
> +platform_driver_register_err:
> + cpuhp_remove_multi_state(dwc_pcie_pmu_hp_state);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}