Re: [PATCH memory-model] docs: memory-barriers: Add note on compiler transformation and address deps

[Jonas Oberhauser]

Am 10/20/2023 um 5:24 PM schrieb Akira Yokosawa:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 2023/10/20 22:57, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> [...]
> > So if there are things that rcu_dereference.rst is missing, they do
> > need to be added.
> As far as I can see, there is no mention of "address dependency"
> in rcu_dereference.rst.
> Yes, I see the discussion in rcu_dereference.rst is all about how
> not to break address dependency by proper uses of rcu_dereference()
> and its friends.  But that might not be obvious for readers who
> followed the references placed in memory-barriers.txt.
>
> Using the term "address dependency" somewhere in rcu_dereference.rst
> should help such readers, I guess.


I think that's a good point.


> [...]
> > > Thanks for the response, I started thinking my mails aren't getting through
> > > again.
> Jonas, FWIW, your email archived at
>
>      https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/1c731fdc-9383-21f2-b2d0-2c879b382687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> didn't reach my gmail inbox.  I looked for it in the spam folder,
> but couldn't find it there either.
>
> Your first reply on Oct 6, which is archived at
>
>      https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/4110a58a-8db5-57c4-2f5a-e09ee054baaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> ended up in my spam folder.
>
> I have no idea why gmail has trouble with your emails so often ...
>
> Anyway, LKML did accept your mails this time.
>
> HTH,
>          Akira


Thanks Akira!

I wrote the gmail support a while ago, but no response.

Currently no idea who to talk to... Oh well.