RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: misc: adi-axi-tdd: Add TDD engine

From: Balas, Eliza
Date: Fri Oct 20 2023 - 07:19:02 EST


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 20:57
> To: Balas, Eliza <Eliza.Balas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@xxxxxxx>; Dragan
> Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@xxxxxxx>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: misc: adi-axi-tdd: Add TDD engine
>
> [External]
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 03:56:46PM +0300, Eliza Balas wrote:
> > +config ADI_AXI_TDD
> > + tristate "Analog Devices TDD Engine support"
> > + depends on HAS_IOMEM
> > + select REGMAP_MMIO
> > + help
> > + The ADI AXI TDD core is the reworked and generic TDD engine which
> > + was developed for general use in Analog Devices HDL projects. Unlike
> > + the previous TDD engine, this core can only be used standalone mode,
> > + and is not embedded into other devices.
>
> What does "previous" mean here? That's not relevant for a kernel help
> text, is it?
>
> Also, what is the module name? Why would someone enable this? What
> userspace tools use it?
>
>
> > +
> > config DUMMY_IRQ
> > tristate "Dummy IRQ handler"
> > help
>
> Why put your entry in this specific location in the file?
>
> > +static int adi_axi_tdd_parse_ms(struct adi_axi_tdd_state *st,
> > + const char *buf,
> > + u64 *res)
> > +{
> > + u64 clk_rate = READ_ONCE(st->clk.rate);
> > + char *orig_str, *modf_str, *int_part, frac_part[7];
> > + long ival, frac;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + orig_str = kstrdup(buf, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + int_part = strsep(&orig_str, ".");
>
> Why are we parsing floating point in the kernel? Please just keep the
> api simple so that we don't have to try to do any type of parsing other
> than turning a single text number into a value.
>

The adi_axi_tdd_parse_ms function does almost the same thing as the
iio_str_to_fixpoint() function which already exists in kernel.
It parses a fixed-point number from a string.
The __iio_str_to_fixpoint is used in a similar way, as I intend to use adi_axi_tdd_parse_ms.
It writes to a channel the corresponding scale (micro,nano) for a value.

Since the device is not an iio device, using an iio function would be confusing.
That is the reason for creating the adi_axi_tdd_parse_ms function, which is easier
to understand since I don't have to make all the multiplications that are made
in the __iio_str_to_fixpoint function.

Thank you for review,
Eliza