Re: [PATCH v8 00/25] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model

[Lukasz Luba]

On 10/19/23 15:04, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > I have tested this on my 2 Arm boards with mainline kernel
> > and almost-mainline. On both platforms it looks stable.
> > The results w/ your patchset looks better.
>
> Thanks for testing!

You're welcome


> [...]
>
> > The performance looks good. Only one test 'Speedometer'
> > has some interesting lower score.
>
> Is it required to look into this more detailed or is the regression in a
> acceptable range for you?

That's something which we can ignore. I have tested with a different
cpu idle governor and it goes away. So, I suspect that the governor
heuristic just probably was confused. I will spend some time on
different idle governor tuning.

Feel free to go forward with this patch set.

> > Fill free to add:
> >
> > Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	Anna-Maria