Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] cpufreq: qti: Introduce cpufreq for ipq95xx

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 11:43, Varadarajan Narayanan
<quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> IPQ95xx SoCs have different OPPs available for the CPU based on
> the SoC variant. This can be determined from an eFuse register
> present in the silicon.
>
> Added support for ipq95xx on nvmem driver which helps to
> determine OPPs at runtime based on the eFuse register which
> has the CPU frequency limits. opp-supported-hw dt binding
> can be used to indicate the available OPPs for each limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:     Simplify bin selection by tweaking the order in dts
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 +
>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> index f43e5cd..4f794ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id blocklist[] __initconst = {
>         { .compatible = "qcom,ipq5332", },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8064", },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8074", },
> +       { .compatible = "qcom,ipq9574", },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,apq8064", },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,msm8974", },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,msm8960", },
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> index 0014909..d44be4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,13 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_kryo_name_version(struct device *cpu_dev,
>         case QCOM_ID_IPQ5300:
>                 drv->versions = 1 << (unsigned int)(*speedbin);
>                 break;
> +       case QCOM_ID_IPQ9514:
> +       case QCOM_ID_IPQ9550:
> +       case QCOM_ID_IPQ9554:
> +       case QCOM_ID_IPQ9570:
> +       case QCOM_ID_IPQ9574:

Can we please merge this to the previous set of cases (and maybe to
apq8096)? I don't see a great benefit in repeating `1 << (unsigned
int)(*speedbin)` several times.

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>

> +               drv->versions = 1 << (unsigned int)(*speedbin);
> +               break;
>         default:
>                 BUG();
>                 break;
> @@ -417,6 +424,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_cpufreq_match_list[] __initconst = {
>         { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8064", .data = &match_data_krait },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8074", .data = &match_data_ipq8074 },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,apq8064", .data = &match_data_krait },
> +       { .compatible = "qcom,ipq9574", .data = &match_data_kryo },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,msm8974", .data = &match_data_krait },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,msm8960", .data = &match_data_krait },
>         {},
> --
> 2.7.4
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry