Re: [PATCH 8/9] dt-bindings: reserved-memory: MediaTek: Add reserved memory for SVP

From: Vijayanand Jitta
Date: Thu Oct 19 2023 - 00:47:01 EST




On 9/11/2023 8:00 AM, Yong Wu wrote:
> This adds the binding for describing a CMA memory for MediaTek SVP(Secure
> Video Path).
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cc10e00d35c4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MediaTek Secure Video Path Reserved Memory
> +
> +description:
> + This binding describes the reserved memory for secure video path.
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: reserved-memory.yaml
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - reusable
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> +
> + reserved-memory {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + reserved-memory@80000000 {
> + compatible = "mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem";
> + reusable;
> + reg = <0x80000000 0x18000000>;
> + };
> + };

Instead of having a vendor specific binding for cma area, How about retrieving
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1594948208-4739-1-git-send-email-hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ ?
dma_heap_add_cma can just associate cma region and create a heap. So, we can reuse cma heap
code for allocation instead of replicating that code here.

Thanks,
Vijay