Re: [PATCH] fat: fix mtime handing in __fat_write_inode

From: Klara Modin
Date: Wed Oct 18 2023 - 08:03:27 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:91:13: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'volatile u16[0]' {aka 'volatile short unsigned int[]'}"
Previous message: Hou Wenlong: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/sme: Mark the code as __head in mem_encrypt_identity.c"
In reply to: Jeff Layton: "Re: [PATCH] fat: fix mtime handing in __fat_write_inode"
Next in thread: Christian Brauner: "Re: [PATCH] fat: fix mtime handing in __fat_write_inode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Den ons 18 okt. 2023 kl 13:55 skrev Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Many thanks for the bug report and testing! Do you mind if we add your
> Tested-by: for this patch?
>
Not at all, please do.

Thanks,
Tested-by: Klara Modin <klarasmodin@xxxxxxxxx>

Next message: kernel test robot: "arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:91:13: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'volatile u16[0]' {aka 'volatile short unsigned int[]'}"
Previous message: Hou Wenlong: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/sme: Mark the code as __head in mem_encrypt_identity.c"
In reply to: Jeff Layton: "Re: [PATCH] fat: fix mtime handing in __fat_write_inode"
Next in thread: Christian Brauner: "Re: [PATCH] fat: fix mtime handing in __fat_write_inode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]