Re: [PATCH] stackleak: Remove unnecessary '0' values from ret

[Mark Rutland]

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 02:08:24PM +0800, Li zeming wrote:
> ret is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the assignment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li zeming <zeming@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Does this actually need to change? It's not harmful, and deleting the
assignment doesn't save any lines of code.

That said, I don't have strong feelings either way, and Kees is the
de-facto-yet-undocumented maintainer for this code, so I will leave it to him
to decide whether to apply.

Mark.

> ---
>  kernel/stackleak.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/stackleak.c b/kernel/stackleak.c
> index 34c9d81eea940..3faf863593846 100644
> --- a/kernel/stackleak.c
> +++ b/kernel/stackleak.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(stack_erasing_bypass);
>  static int stack_erasing_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  			void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
>  {
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int ret;
>  	int state = !static_branch_unlikely(&stack_erasing_bypass);
>  	int prev_state = state;
>  
> -- 
> 2.18.2
>