Re: [PATCH v7 10/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add RK3568 support

[Chanwoo Choi]

On 23. 10. 16. 20:34, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 03:17:14AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 23. 7. 4. 18:32, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>> This adds RK3568 support to the DFI driver.  Only iniitialization
>>> differs from the currently supported RK3399.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  include/soc/rockchip/rk3568_grf.h    | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 include/soc/rockchip/rk3568_grf.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
>>> index 6b3ef97b3be09..261d112580c9e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>>  
>>>  #include <soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h>
>>>  #include <soc/rockchip/rk3399_grf.h>
>>> +#include <soc/rockchip/rk3568_grf.h>
>>>  
>>>  #define DMC_MAX_CHANNELS	2
>>>  
>>> @@ -209,10 +210,30 @@ static int rk3399_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> +static int rk3568_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct regmap *regmap_pmu = dfi->regmap_pmu;
>>> +	u32 reg2, reg3;
>>> +
>>> +	regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3568_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, &reg2);
>>> +	regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3568_PMUGRF_OS_REG3, &reg3);
>>> +
>>> +	dfi->ddr_type = FIELD_GET(RK3568_PMUGRF_OS_REG2_DRAMTYPE_INFO, reg2);
> 
> The ddr_type is 5 bits wide. The lower three bits are here.
> 
>>> +
>>> +	if (FIELD_GET(RK3568_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_SYSREG_VERSION, reg3) >= 0x3)
>>> +		dfi->ddr_type |= FIELD_GET(RK3568_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_DRAMTYPE_INFO_V3, reg3) << 3;
> 
> The upper two bits are here, hence we need to shift the value above the
> lower three bits.
> 
>>
>> There are no reason of why shifting the '3'.
>> Could you add the comment about '3' or add the constant definition '3'?
> 
> I don't think adding a constant makes sense. I'll add a comment making
> it more clear what happens.

It is enough to add the comment. Thanks.

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +	dfi->channel_mask = 1;
>>
>> nitpick.
>> On other rkXXXX_dfi_init, use GENMASK() to initialize 'dfi->channel_mask'.
>> In order to keep the consistency, it is better to use BIT() macro as following:
>> 	dfi->channel_mask = BIT(0);
> 
> Ok, will do.

Thanks.

> 
> Sascha
> 

-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi