Re: [PATCH smp,csd] Throw an error if a CSD lock is stuck for too long

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Mon Oct 16 2023 - 17:37:15 EST

Next message: Kirill A. Shutemov: "Re: [PATCHv2] efi/unaccepted: Fix soft lockups caused by parallel memory acceptance"
Previous message: Raghavendra Rao Ananta: "Re: [PATCH v7 07/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set PMCR_EL0.N for vCPU based on the associated PMU"
In reply to: Leonardo Bras: "Re: [PATCH smp,csd] Throw an error if a CSD lock is stuck for too long"
Next in thread: Leonardo Bras: "Re: [PATCH smp,csd] Throw an error if a CSD lock is stuck for too long"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 05:58:23PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 05:52:57PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:27:51AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:26:22PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 09:39:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:32:07AM +1100, Imran Khan wrote:
> > > > > > Hello Paul,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 6/10/2023 3:48 am, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > > The CSD lock seems to get stuck in 2 "modes". When it gets stuck
> > > > > > > temporarily, it usually gets released in a few seconds, and sometimes
> > > > > > > up to one or two minutes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If the CSD lock stays stuck for more than several minutes, it never
> > > > > > > seems to get unstuck, and gradually more and more things in the system
> > > > > > > end up also getting stuck.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the latter case, we should just give up, so the system can dump out
> > > > > > > a little more information about what went wrong, and, with panic_on_oops
> > > > > > > and a kdump kernel loaded, dump a whole bunch more information about
> > > > > > > what might have gone wrong.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Question: should this have its own panic_on_ipistall switch in
> > > > > > > /proc/sys/kernel, or maybe piggyback on panic_on_oops in a different
> > > > > > > way than via BUG_ON?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > panic_on_ipistall (set to 1 by default) looks better option to me. For systems
> > > > > > where such delay is acceptable and system can eventually get back to sane state,
> > > > > > this option (set to 0 after boot) would prevent crashing the system for
> > > > > > apparently benign CSD hangs of long duration.
> > > > >
> > > > > Good point! How about like the following?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanx, Paul
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > commit 6bcf3786291b86f13b3e13d51e998737a8009ec3
> > > > > Author: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Date: Mon Aug 21 16:04:09 2023 -0400
> > > > >
> > > > > smp,csd: Throw an error if a CSD lock is stuck for too long
> > > > >
> > > > > The CSD lock seems to get stuck in 2 "modes". When it gets stuck
> > > > > temporarily, it usually gets released in a few seconds, and sometimes
> > > > > up to one or two minutes.
> > > > >
> > > > > If the CSD lock stays stuck for more than several minutes, it never
> > > > > seems to get unstuck, and gradually more and more things in the system
> > > > > end up also getting stuck.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the latter case, we should just give up, so the system can dump out
> > > > > a little more information about what went wrong, and, with panic_on_oops
> > > > > and a kdump kernel loaded, dump a whole bunch more information about what
> > > > > might have gone wrong. In addition, there is an smp.panic_on_ipistall
> > > > > kernel boot parameter that by default retains the old behavior, but when
> > > > > set enables the panic after the CSD lock has been stuck for more than
> > > > > five minutes.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ paulmck: Apply Imran Khan feedback. ]
> > > > >
> > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/bc7cc8b0-f587-4451-8bcd-0daae627bcc7@paulmck-laptop/
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > index 0a1731a0f0ef..592935267ce2 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > @@ -5858,6 +5858,11 @@
> > > > > This feature may be more efficiently disabled
> > > > > using the csdlock_debug- kernel parameter.
> > > > >
> > > > > + smp.panic_on_ipistall= [KNL]
> > > > > + If a csd_lock_timeout extends for more than
> > > > > + five minutes, panic the system. By default, let
> > > > > + CSD-lock acquisition take as long as they take.
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > It could be interesting to have it as an s64 parameter (in {mili,}seconds)
> > > > instead of bool, this way the user could pick the time to wait before the
> > > > panic happens. 0 or -1 could mean disabled.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Other than that,
> > > > Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Thank you for looking this over!
> > >
> > > How about with the diff shown below, to be folded into the original?
> > > I went with int instead of s64 because I am having some difficulty
> > > imagining anyone specifying more than a 24-day timeout. ;-)
> >
> > I suggested s64 just because it was the type being used in
> > BUG_ON(panic_on_ipistall && (s64)ts_delta > 300000000000LL);
> >
> > But anyway, int should be fine.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanx, Paul
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > index ccb7621eff79..ea5ae9deb753 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > @@ -5931,8 +5931,10 @@
> > >
> > > smp.panic_on_ipistall= [KNL]
> > > If a csd_lock_timeout extends for more than
> > > - five minutes, panic the system. By default, let
> > > - CSD-lock acquisition take as long as they take.
> > > + the specified number of milliseconds, panic the
> > > + system. By default, let CSD-lock acquisition
> > > + take as long as they take. Specifying 300,000
> > > + for this value provides a 10-minute timeout.
> >
> > 300,000 ms is 300s, which is 5 minutes, right?

Right you are! Fixed, please see replacement fixup patch below.

> > > smsc-ircc2.nopnp [HW] Don't use PNP to discover SMC devices
> > > smsc-ircc2.ircc_cfg= [HW] Device configuration I/O port
> > > diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> > > index b6a0773a7015..d3ca47f32f38 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/smp.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> > > @@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, cur_csd_info);
> > >
> > > static ulong csd_lock_timeout = 5000; /* CSD lock timeout in milliseconds. */
> > > module_param(csd_lock_timeout, ulong, 0444);
> > > -static bool panic_on_ipistall;
> > > -module_param(panic_on_ipistall, bool, 0444);
> > > +static int panic_on_ipistall; /* CSD panic timeout in milliseconds, 300000 for ten minutes. */
> >
> > s/ten/five

And right you are again!

> > > +module_param(panic_on_ipistall, int, 0444);
> > >
> > > static atomic_t csd_bug_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > >
> > > @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(struct __call_single_data *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *
> > > * to become unstuck. Use a signed comparison to avoid triggering
> > > * on underflows when the TSC is out of sync between sockets.
> > > */
> > > - BUG_ON(panic_on_ipistall && (s64)ts_delta > 300000000000LL);
> > > + BUG_ON(panic_on_ipistall > 0 && (s64)ts_delta > ((s64)panic_on_ipistall * NSEC_PER_MSEC));
> >
> > s64 here would avoid casting (s64)panic_on_ipistall, but I think it does
> > not really impact readability.
> >
> > IIUC ts_delta is an u64 being casted as s64, which could be an issue but no
> > computer system will actually take over 2^31 ns (292 years) to run 1
> > iteration, so it's safe.

Back at you with s/2^31/2^63/. ;-)

> > I think it's a nice feaure :)
>
> s/feaure/feature
>
> Also, FWIW:
> Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@xxxxxxxxxx>

I have that down as well, and thank you again!

Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index ccb7621eff79..e1fe26dae586 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -5931,8 +5931,10 @@

smp.panic_on_ipistall= [KNL]
If a csd_lock_timeout extends for more than
- five minutes, panic the system. By default, let
- CSD-lock acquisition take as long as they take.
+ the specified number of milliseconds, panic the
+ system. By default, let CSD-lock acquisition
+ take as long as they take. Specifying 300,000
+ for this value provides a 5-minute timeout.

smsc-ircc2.nopnp [HW] Don't use PNP to discover SMC devices
smsc-ircc2.ircc_cfg= [HW] Device configuration I/O port
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index b6a0773a7015..695eb13a276d 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, cur_csd_info);

static ulong csd_lock_timeout = 5000; /* CSD lock timeout in milliseconds. */
module_param(csd_lock_timeout, ulong, 0444);
-static bool panic_on_ipistall;
-module_param(panic_on_ipistall, bool, 0444);
+static int panic_on_ipistall; /* CSD panic timeout in milliseconds, 300000 for five minutes. */
+module_param(panic_on_ipistall, int, 0444);

static atomic_t csd_bug_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);

@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(struct __call_single_data *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *
* to become unstuck. Use a signed comparison to avoid triggering
* on underflows when the TSC is out of sync between sockets.
*/
- BUG_ON(panic_on_ipistall && (s64)ts_delta > 300000000000LL);
+ BUG_ON(panic_on_ipistall > 0 && (s64)ts_delta > ((s64)panic_on_ipistall * NSEC_PER_MSEC));
if (cpu_cur_csd && csd != cpu_cur_csd) {
pr_alert("\tcsd: CSD lock (#%d) handling prior %pS(%ps) request.\n",
*bug_id, READ_ONCE(per_cpu(cur_csd_func, cpux)),

Next message: Kirill A. Shutemov: "Re: [PATCHv2] efi/unaccepted: Fix soft lockups caused by parallel memory acceptance"
Previous message: Raghavendra Rao Ananta: "Re: [PATCH v7 07/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set PMCR_EL0.N for vCPU based on the associated PMU"
In reply to: Leonardo Bras: "Re: [PATCH smp,csd] Throw an error if a CSD lock is stuck for too long"
Next in thread: Leonardo Bras: "Re: [PATCH smp,csd] Throw an error if a CSD lock is stuck for too long"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]