Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: dsa: Use conduit and user terms

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Mon Oct 16 2023 - 13:03:33 EST


On 10/16/23 06:23, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 02:52:50PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Use more inclusive terms throughout the DSA subsystem by moving away
from "master" which is replaced by "conduit" and "slave" which is
replaced by "user". No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/dsa/configuration.rst b/Documentation/networking/dsa/configuration.rst
index d2934c40f0f1..e6c9719874b0 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/dsa/configuration.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/dsa/configuration.rst
-Past this point, the DSA slave network devices get delivered regular Ethernet
+Past this point, the DSA user network devices get delivered regular Ethernet
frames that can be processed by the networking stack.
-Slave network devices
+User network devices
---------------------

Please adjust section underline width.

Done.


Do we want a sentence in the documentation that clarifies that "user interfaces"
and "conduit interfaces" used to be called "slave interfaces" and "master interfaces"
(for 15 years), so that old time users don't get confused as to what happened?

Sure, we can do that.


@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ int dsa_port_vlan_filtering(struct dsa_port *dp, bool vlan_filtering,
}
/* This enforces legacy behavior for switch drivers which assume they can't
- * receive VLAN configuration when enslaved to a bridge with vlan_filtering=0
+ * receive VLAN configuration when enuserd to a bridge with vlan_filtering=0

when joining a bridge

*/
bool dsa_port_skip_vlan_configuration(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
@@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ static int dsa_switch_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
err = dsa_switch_tag_8021q_vlan_del(ds, info);
break;
case DSA_NOTIFIER_MASTER_STATE_CHANGE:

As Stephen points out, maybe you want to change this notifier name as well.

- err = dsa_switch_master_state_change(ds, info);
+ err = dsa_switch_conduit_state_change(ds, info);
break;
default:
err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
diff --git a/net/dsa/tag.h b/net/dsa/tag.h
index 32d12f4a9d73..f6b9c73718df 100644
--- a/net/dsa/tag.h
+++ b/net/dsa/tag.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include <net/dsa.h>
#include "port.h"
-#include "slave.h"
+#include "user.h"
struct dsa_tag_driver {
const struct dsa_device_ops *ops;
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static inline int dsa_tag_protocol_overhead(const struct dsa_device_ops *ops)
return ops->needed_headroom + ops->needed_tailroom;
}
-static inline struct net_device *dsa_master_find_slave(struct net_device *dev,
+static inline struct net_device *dsa_conduit_find_user(struct net_device *dev,
int device, int port)

Please adjust alignment.

checkpatch did not complain and my editor shows me the alignment appears to be proper, what am I missing?


{
struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dev->dsa_ptr;
diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_8021q.c b/net/dsa/tag_8021q.c
index cbdfc392f7e0..71b26ae6db39 100644
--- a/net/dsa/tag_8021q.c
+++ b/net/dsa/tag_8021q.c
@@ -468,10 +468,10 @@ struct sk_buff *dsa_8021q_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_8021q_xmit);
-struct net_device *dsa_tag_8021q_find_port_by_vbid(struct net_device *master,
+struct net_device *dsa_tag_8021q_find_port_by_vbid(struct net_device *conduit,
int vbid)

Alignment.

Likewise.


{
- struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = master->dsa_ptr;
+ struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = conduit->dsa_ptr;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = cpu_dp->dst;
struct dsa_port *dp;
diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_8021q.h b/net/dsa/tag_8021q.h
index b75cbaa028ef..41f7167ac520 100644
--- a/net/dsa/tag_8021q.h
+++ b/net/dsa/tag_8021q.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct sk_buff *dsa_8021q_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev,
void dsa_8021q_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, int *source_port, int *switch_id,
int *vbid);
-struct net_device *dsa_tag_8021q_find_port_by_vbid(struct net_device *master,
+struct net_device *dsa_tag_8021q_find_port_by_vbid(struct net_device *conduit,
int vbid);

Alignment.

Likewise.
--
Florian